Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Euclid at 100: The Past, Present, and Future of Zoning in America
Isaiah McKinney, Robert H. Thomas, Michael A. Wolf
This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Village of Euclid v....
Parental Rights from the Founding to Present Day
Michael P. Farris, Martin Guggenheim, Melissa Moschella, Anthony Sanders, Gene C. Schaerr
CLE credit for this event is available at On-Demand CLE. Parental rights have long occupied...
Parental Rights from the Founding to Present Day
Michael P. Farris, Martin Guggenheim, Melissa Moschella, Anthony Sanders, Gene C. Schaerr
CLE credit for this event is available at On-Demand CLE. Parental rights have long occupied...
Parental Rights from the Founding to Present Day
Closing Banquet: Keynote Address and Presentation of the Annual Joseph Story Award and Feddie Awards*
Lawrence VanDyke
Keynote Address: The Proper Judicial Role, 250 Years Later Hon. Lawrence VanDyke, Judge, United States Court...
Are Secret Gender Transition Policies Unconstitutional? Mirabelli v. Bonta and the New Frontier in Parental Rights
Peter Breen, John J. Bursch, Sarah Parshall Perry, Eric Rassbach
Parental rights advocates celebrate the recent victory in Mirabelli v. Bonta, where the Supreme Court granted...
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Legal Review: Dobbs and the Holdings of Roe and Casey
Eric R. Claeys, Richard M. Re
Before the Supreme Court this term is the question of whether all pre-viability bans on...
Opioid Litigations and Public Nuisance: Updates From California, Oklahoma, and Ohio
John Shu
On February 25, 2022, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health,...
Litigation Update: Johnson & Johnson v. Ingham
John M. Reeves
Johnson & Johnson v. Ingham is a pending petition before the U.S. Supreme Court. It involves...