Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel I: Methods of Interpreting the Economic Rights Provisions of the Constitution [Archive Collection]
Mark Kelman, Gary Lawson, Henry G. Manne, Roger Pilon, Mario J. Rizzo
On October 16-17, 1987, the Federalist Society hosted a symposium in celebration of the bicentennial...
The Deterioration of Appropriate Remedies in Patent Disputes
Geoffrey A. Manne, Kristian Stout, Julian Morris, Dirk Auer
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Showcase Panel IV: Originalism and Precedent
Tara Leigh Grove, Bernadette Meyler, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Neomi Rao, Lawrence Solum
On November 16, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the fourth showcase panel of the 2019...
Showcase Panel III: Does Originalism Protect Unenumerated Rights?
Stephanie Barclay, Randy E. Barnett, Gary Lawson, Michael W. McConnell, Kevin C. Newsom, Dean Reuter, Jamal Greene
On November 16, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the third showcase panel of the 2019...
Showcase Panel III: Does Originalism Protect Unenumerated Rights?
Stephanie Barclay, Randy E. Barnett, Gary Lawson, Michael W. McConnell, Kevin C. Newsom, Dean Reuter, Jamal Greene
On November 16, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the third showcase panel of the 2019...
Twelfth Annual Rosenkranz Debate & Luncheon
Stuart Kyle Duncan, Philip A. Hamburger, Michael W. McConnell, Eugene B. Meyer
RESOLVED: The Free Exercise Clause guarantees a constitutional right of religious exemption from general laws...
Twelfth Annual Rosenkranz Debate & Luncheon
Stuart Kyle Duncan, Philip A. Hamburger, Michael W. McConnell, Eugene B. Meyer
RESOLVED: The Free Exercise Clause guarantees a constitutional right of religious exemption from general laws...
Showcase Panel IV: Originalism and Precedent
2019 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCTwelfth Annual Rosenkranz Debate & Luncheon
2019 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCShowcase Panel III: Does Originalism Protect Unenumerated Rights?
2019 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DC