Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Necessary & Proper Episode 67: Non-Delegation? Or No Divesting? Art. I, Sec. 1 at the Founding and Today
Nicholas Bagley, Philip A. Hamburger, Jenn L. Mascott, Nicholas R. Parrillo, Neomi Rao
On May 17, as part of their annual Executive Branch Review Conference, the Federalist Society's...
Non-Delegation? Or No Divesting? Art. I, Sec. 1 at the Founding and Today
Administrative Law & Regulation and Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Groups
Non-Delegation? Or No Divesting? Art. I, Sec. 1 at the Founding and Today
Nicholas Bagley, Philip A. Hamburger, Jenn L. Mascott, Nicholas R. Parrillo, Neomi Rao
Whether as the result of hyper-partisanship or as a residue of the constitutional design for...
2021 Executive Branch Review Week
The Next Four Years
Topics
A Foundation for Rethinking Administrative Law
New casebooks can be hard to justify. Many legal doctrines and their canonical cases are...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Kody Cooper
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
Bureaucracy With Bumper Guards: Better Than It Rules?
Ronald A. Cass
A review of Law & Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State, by Cass Sunstein & Adrian...
Is Our Modern Administrative State Unmoored from the Morality of Law?
Ted Hirt
A review of The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law, by Richard A. Epstein (Manhattan Institute...
The Federalist Paper, Winter 2020
The Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention was held in November and, as always, it was...
Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations
Christian R. Burset, Mihailis E. Diamantis, Sean J. Griffith, Tara Leigh Grove, Michael T. Morley, Lawrence Solum, Ryan Williams, Ilan Wurman, Philip A. Hamburger
On January 3-4, 2020, the Federalist Society hosted its 22nd annual Faculty Conference at the...