Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Revitalizing the Nondelegation Doctrine
Paul James Larkin
A Review of The Administrative State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation Doctrine (Peter...
Panel: Police Powers and the Pandemic
23rd Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
Panel: Police Powers and the Pandemic
David Bernstein, John C. Harrison, Julia D. Mahoney, Daniel B. Rodriguez, Ilan Wurman
With the many COVID-19 emergency measures undertaken by state and local officials as a backdrop,...
Panel IV: The Role of the Legislative and Executive Branches in Interpreting the Constitution [Archive Collection]
John C. Harrison, Robert F. Nagel, Burt Neuborne, Daniel Polsby, Steven R. Ross
On April 3-5, 1987, the Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter hosted the sixth annual National...
Panel IV: The Role of the Legislative and Executive Branches in Interpreting the Constitution [Archive Collection]
John C. Harrison, Robert F. Nagel, Burt Neuborne, Daniel Polsby, Steven R. Ross
On April 3-5, 1987, the Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter hosted the sixth annual National...
Originalism & Precedent: Exploring Paths to Reform
Virginia Student Chapter
Charlottesville , VAPanel: Who's Afraid of Substantive Due Process?: Original Meaning and the Due Process of Law
Randy E. Barnett, Nathan Chapman, John C. Harrison, Christina M. Mulligan, Ryan Williams, Vicki C. Jackson, Lee Liberman Otis
Conventional wisdom holds that the original meaning of the "due process of law," as used...
Panel: Who's Afraid of Substantive Due Process?: Original Meaning and the Due Process of Law
Randy E. Barnett, Nathan Chapman, John C. Harrison, Vicki C. Jackson, Christina M. Mulligan, Lee Liberman Otis, Ryan Williams
Conventional wisdom holds that the original meaning of the "due process of law," as used...
Panel: Who's Afraid of Substantive Due Process?: Original Meaning and the Due Process of Law
21st Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
New Orleans, LAEleventh Annual Rosenkranz Debate & Luncheon
2018 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DC