Arthur D. Hellman, a professor of law at the University of Pittsburgh, is a nationally recognized scholar of the federal courts who has also written in the area of the First Amendment. His publications include numerous articles and several books, including casebooks in both areas, Federal Courts: Cases and Materials on Judicial Federalism and the Lawyering Process (3d edition 2013) (with Lauren Robel and David Stras); and First Amendment Law: Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion (3d edition 2014) (with William D. Araiza and Thomas E. Baker).
In addition to his casebooks and academic writing, Processor Hellman has worked with the Judiciary Committees in the House and Senate in drafting federal courts legislation. The legislative histories of two recent jurisdictional statutes – the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 and the “Holmes Group Fix” (enacted as part of the America Invents Act) acknowledge his contributions.
Professor Hellman has also testified as an invited witness at numerous hearings of both Judiciary Committees. His testimony has focused on a wide variety of legislative issues related to the federal courts, including the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; proposals to divide the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; federal judicial discipline; unpublished appellate opinions; and the constitutionality of legislative restrictions on the powers of the federal courts.
In 2005 Professor Hellman was appointed as the inaugural holder of the Sally Ann Semenko Endowed Chair at the University. In 2002 he received the Chancellor’s Distinguished Research Award “as a faculty member who has an outstanding and continuing record of research and scholarly activity.” He received his JD from Yale University Law School and his BA from Harvard University.
- JD, Yale University
- BA, Harvard University
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Judicial Disability: Can the Federal Courts Inquire into Mental Fitness?
Professional Responsibilities & Legal Education Practice Group Teleforum
TeleforumProfessional Responsibility & Legal Education: Using Judicial Processes for Political Purposes
2016 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Show Me the Money: Regulation of Political Speech
Pittsburgh Student Chapter
University of Pittsburgh School of Law3900 Forbes Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Professional Responsibility: The Disciplining of Federal Judges
2008 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Judicial Disability: Can the Federal Courts Inquire into Mental Fitness?
Professional Responsibilities & Legal Education Practice Group Teleforum
On August 14, 2017, the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference...
Professional Responsibility & Legal Education: Using Judicial Processes for Political Purposes
2016 National Lawyers Convention
“Those who won our independence," Justice Brandeis wrote nearly a century ago, “eschewed silence coerced...
Professional Responsibility & Legal Education: Using Judicial Processes for Political Purposes
2016 National Lawyers Convention
“Those who won our independence," Justice Brandeis wrote nearly a century ago, “eschewed silence coerced...
The Fraudulent Joinder Prevention Act of 2016: A New Standard and a New Rationale for an Old Doctrine
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the doctrine of fraudulent joinder and an ongoing attempt to...
Professional Responsibility: The Disciplining of Federal Judges
2008 National Lawyers Convention
Suddenly, the subject of federal judicial ethics is making news. At least four federal judges...