1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC, DC 20036
On September 15, 2021, the Federalist Society presented this special day-long, in-person conference on Judge Robert Bork's The Antitrust Paradox. The influential work has been recently republished so that the new generation of general practitioners and antitrust thinkers alike can bring his work to bear on their own. This conference featured discussion of the book and its relevance to contemporary antitrust issues.
With the rising anger at platform companies, there is a growing bipartisan chorus of policy-makers calling for the expansion of the antitrust statutes. Some lawmakers have called for a broad expansion of laws to apply to all industries, while others have sought the application only to the social media companies. The consumer welfare standard championed by former Judge Robert Bork in his seminal work The Antitrust Paradox has been called into question. With Congress holding hearings and poised to act on antitrust legislation, these panel discussions are timely and they feature experts who will reviewthe history of antitrust law to the present day and discuss the implications of various congressional proposals to amend current statutes.
Please direct questions about the event to [email protected].
Back to topThe Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
Topics: | Corporations, Securities & Antitrust |
---|
On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. The opening address featured President of the Bork Foundation Robert Bork, Jr. who discussed his efforts to republish his father's famous work, The Antitrust Paradox, so that lawyers, scholars, and interested citizens could bring Judge Bork's work to bear on their own. Judge Douglas Ginsburg, who served as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, moderated the conversation.
Featuring:
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
Topics: | Corporations, Securities & Antitrust |
---|
On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. This panel of experts reviewed the history of antitrust law, with a special focus on the consumer welfare standard, and offered their diverse perspectives on its origins, purposes, and effectiveness.
Featuring:
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
Lunch will be served separately in the State Room.
The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
Topics: | Corporations, Securities & Antitrust |
---|
On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. This panel covered antitrust law reform proposals and discussed their marketplace implications. These experts and practioners offered their divergent views on where antitrust law is headed and where it should go.
Featuring:
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.
The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going
Topics: | Corporations, Securities & Antitrust |
---|
On September 15, 2021, The Federalist Society's Practice Groups hosted a conference titled The Antitrust Paradox: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. Senator Mike Lee, who penned the introduction to the republished Antitrust Paradox, spoke on Judge Bork's seminal work and its continued relevance.
Featuring:
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.