Bucklew v. Precythe: The Decision [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring John Stinneford
Short video featuring John Stinneford
In 2014, Russell Bucklew asserted that the lethal injection protocol in Missouri was cruel and unusual as applied to him due to a particular medical condition from which he suffered. While Bucklew proposed an alternative method of execution, the state of Missouri argued that this did not meet the test established by the Supreme Court in Baze v. Rees and Glossip v. Gross.
Was Missouri’s lethal injection protocol a violation of the Eighth Amendment in this particular case? Prof. John Stinneford of the University of Florida Levin College of Law discusses the intricacies of as-applied challenges and death penalty tests in Bucklew v. Precythe.
*****
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speaker.
Learn more about John Stinneford:
https://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/john-f-stinneford
Follow John Stinneford on Twitter: @JohnStinneford
https://twitter.com/johnstinneford
*****
Related Links & Differing Views:
Reason: “What Bucklew Doesn’t Say”
https://reason.com/2019/04/03/what-bucklew-doesnt-say
Los Angeles Times: “Supreme Court says the Constitution does not ensure a ‘painless’ execution”
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-supreme-court-execution-lethal-injection-20190401-story.html
The Atlantic: “Unusual Cruelty at the Supreme Court”
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/bucklew-v-precythe-supreme-court-turns-cruelty/586471/
The Washington Post: “Divided Supreme Court rules against death-row inmate with rare condition”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/divided-supreme-court-rules-against-death-row-inmate-with-rare-condition/2019/04/01/ff523fdc-5489-11e9-8ef3-fbd41a2ce4d5_story.html
University of Miami Law Review: “Gaming The Capital Punishment System—Bucklew v. Precythe”
https://lawreview.law.miami.edu/gaming-capital-punishment-system-bucklew-v-precythe/
The Federalist Society: “Courthouse Steps Decision Teleforum: Bucklew v. Precythe”
https://fedsoc.org/events/courthouse-steps-decision-teleforum-bucklew-v-precythe
Professor of Law and Assistant Director, Criminal Justice Center, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Professor Stinneford teaches and writes about legal ethics, criminal law, criminal procedure, and constitutional law. His work has been cited by the United States Supreme Court, several state supreme courts and federal courts of appeal, and numerous scholars. It has published in numerous scholarly journals including the Georgetown Law Journal, the Northwestern University Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Notre Dame Law Review, and the William & Mary Law Review. The Stanford-Yale Junior faculty forum selected one of his articles as the best paper in the category of Constitutional History, and the AALS Criminal Justice Section named another article as the best paper in its Junior Scholars Paper Competition. In the fall of 2015, he was a Visiting Scholar at the Georgetown Law Center, Center for the Constitution.
Before joining the Florida faculty in 2009, Stinneford clerked for the Hon. James Moran of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, served as an Assistant United States Attorney, and practiced law with Winston & Strawn in Chicago. Stinneford teaches first-year courses in Criminal Law and Constitutional Law, and upper-level courses in Professional Responsibility, Criminal Procedure, Federal Criminal Law, Law & Literature, and White Collar Crime.