Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel V: Is Judicial Review Democratic?
Tara Leigh Grove, James C. Ho, Lawrence Sager, Keith E. Whittington
2023 National Student Symposium
Judicial Review has been criticized throughout American history as undemocratic, creating what has been known...
Panel IV: Does Federalism Lead to a More United or Disunited Democracy?
Jud Campbell, Michael S. Greve, Andrew Oldham, Ilya Somin
2023 National Student Symposium
The United States is constitutionally not one, but fifty-one, democracies. How can they all fit...
Panel III: Unique Aspects of American Democracy: Structural Bugs or Features?
Stephanie Barclay, Patrick J. Bumatay, Sanford V. Levinson, Lori A. Ringhand, Bradley A. Smith
2023 National Student Symposium
Many aspects of the United States governing structure have been criticized as inconsistent with democracy...
Panel II: The Democratic Election Process: What is Fair and Who Decides Fairness?
Lee E. Goodman, Derek T. Muller, Audrey Martin, Richard H. Pildes, Timothy M. Tymkovich
2023 National Student Symposium
Democracy begins with elections. But the process for voting in our elections has been increasingly...
Panel I: What is Democracy?
J. Joel Alicea, Bruce Cain, Edith H. Jones, Daniel H. Lowenstein, Stephen I. Vladeck
2023 National Student Symposium
There has been much discussion about threats to democracy over the past year. But conceptions...
Public Defenders and Political Advocacy: What Is a Public Defender's Role?
Matthew P. Cavedon, Maud Maron, Tiffany Williams Roberts
Over the past several years, a debate has erupted within the world of indigent defense:...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi
Robert J. Rando
On November 4, 2022, the Supreme Court granted cert in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, a patent...
Abraham Accords: Promise-Potential; Risk-Reality
David P. Goldman, Bernard Haykel, Brian H. Hook, Jamil N. Jaffer
As Indonesia, Somalia, Niger, and Mauritania may be next to join the Abraham Accords, what...
A Discussion on the FAR Council's Federal Supplier Climate Risks and Resilience Proposed Rule
Adam Gustafson, John Kostyack, Brian Richman, Markus Speidel
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
What happens when the Administration’s “whole-of-government approach” to climate change meets federal contracting? The Department...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Combo: Smith v. United States & Samia v. United States -Cases on Criminal Law Procedure
Robert K. McBride
In this two-for-one Teleforum, we will cover two cases with questions concerning criminal law and...