Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
Docket Watch: State v. Jean
Does a passenger traveling with the owner of a private vehicle have a reasonable expectation...
Topics
Live Stream: Address by National Security Advisor John R. Bolton
This stream will go live after 12:00 p.m. EST. "Protecting American Constitutionalism and Sovereignty from...
Topics
Docket Watch: Cooper v. Berger et al.
“A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty.” ...
Topics
Docket Watch: Hunsucker v. Fallin
With certain limited exceptions, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has in the past followed the U.S....
Topics
Docket Watch: California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland
Unlike our federal structure of government, which places the legislative power exclusively in the hands...
Topics
What Does DOJ’s Statement of Interest Filed in the Harvard Case Mean?
Recently, the Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in a lawsuit against Harvard University...
Topics
On the Future of the Chevron Doctrine
Joel Nolette is a litigation attorney at Mintz Levin in Boston, and an active member...
Topics
The Third Annual Mike Lewis Memorial Teleforum
There is broad agreement that international law applies to cyber conflict. There is less agreement...
Standing in Ohio – Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich
Preterm-Cleveland, Inc., v. Kasich,[1] establishes two important issues of Ohio constitutional law. First, a litigant...
Topics
Docket Watch: Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Department of Education
In Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Department of Education, the Ohio Supreme Court held...