Facts of the Case
In 1938, Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to regulate many aspects of employment, including minimum wages, maximum weekly hours, and child labor. When a lumber manufacturer, Darby, shipped lumber out of state, he was arrested for violating the FLSA. His charges were dismissed because the federal district court found that FLSA was unconstitutional. The court reasoned that the FLSA’s potential effects on intrastate activities violated the Commerce Clause.
Questions
Was the Act a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce?
Conclusions
-
The unanimous Court upheld the FLSA. Relying heavily on the Court's decision in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Justice Stone affirmed the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, which "can neither be enlarged nor diminished by the exercise or non-exercise of state power." The Court held that the purpose of the FLSA was to prevent states from using substandard labor practices to their own economic advantage by interstate commerce. Congress acted with proper authority in outlawing substandard labor conditions since they have a significant impact on interstate commerce.
The Mythical McCulloch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A Review of The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of...
The Mythical McCulloch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A Review of The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of...
More News on Powers Reserved Exclusively to the States
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
More News on Powers Reserved Exclusively to the States
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
The Founders Interpret the Constitution: The Division of Federal and State Powers
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article surveys ratification-era statements by defenders of the proposed Constitution...
The Founders Interpret the Constitution: The Division of Federal and State Powers
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article surveys ratification-era statements by defenders of the proposed Constitution...
Does EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposal Violate the States’ Sovereign Rights?
Engage Volume 16, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan under...
Does EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposal Violate the States’ Sovereign Rights?
Engage Volume 16, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan under...
Florida Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare: It All Comes Down to Broccoli
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This paper provides an update on the litigation dealing with the...
Florida Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare: It All Comes Down to Broccoli
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This paper provides an update on the litigation dealing with the...
SCOTUS term
Online Debate
On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court handed down its last decisions of the Spring...
Dragooning State Officials into Federal Service
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In a century driven by the Progressive-Era view that ever-larger government can solve the manifold...
Dragooning State Officials into Federal Service
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In a century driven by the Progressive-Era view that ever-larger government can solve the manifold...