Facts of the Case
Geraldine Tyler owned a condominium in Minneapolis. She stopped paying her property taxes and accrued a tax debt of $15,000. To satisfy the debt, Hennepin County foreclosed on Tyler’s property and sold it for $40,000, retaining the net proceeds from the sale.
Tyler sued the County, arguing that its actions violated her constitutional rights. The district court dismissed Tyler’s case for failure to state a claim, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed.
Questions
Does taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violate the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause?
Is the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt a fine within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
Taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the unanimous opinion of the Court holding that Tyler plausibly alleged that Hennepin County’s actions violated the Takings Clause and thus that her claim can go forward.
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the government from taking private property without “just compensation.” This does not prevent the government from collecting taxes, or from taking action to enforce the collection of taxes. However, the government may not, as Minnesota purported to do by statute in 1935, extinguish a property owner’s interest in property when she falls behind on her property taxes. English law, from which the U.S. Constitution derives much meaning, has long proscribed the taking of more from a taxpayer than she owes. Moreover, Supreme Court precedents and Minnesota law itself, in other contexts, recognize the principle that a taxpayer is entitled to the surplus in excess of the debt owed.
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joined, addressing the second question presented, which the majority declined to address. In Justice Gorsuch’s view, Hennepin County’s actions likely also violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.
Toward a More Confident State Constitutionalism
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
This article is adapted from a speech Justice Markman delivered to the Florida Annual Education...
The Supreme Court’s Property Rights Doubleheader
The Supreme Court will hear back-to-back two major property rights cases this term. On January...
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting
A Supreme Court ruling, like many other things, may not be quite what it seems....
Courthouse Steps Decision: Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota
On Thursday, May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Tyler v....
Courthouse Steps Decision: Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota
On Thursday, May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Tyler v....
Major Unanimous Supreme Court Victory for Property Rights in Tyler v. Hennepin County
This post was originally published at the Volokh Conspiracy. [Thursday] morning, the Supreme Court issued...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Tyler v. Hennepin County
On Wednesday, April 26th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota. ...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Tyler v. Hennepin County
On Wednesday, April 26th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota. ...
A Seat at the Sitting - April 2023
The April Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
A Seat at the Sitting - April 2023
The April Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
Courthouse Steps Preview: Tyler v. Hennepin County
The Supreme Court Decides Whether Government Taking of Surplus Proceeds from a Tax-Foreclosure Sale Violates the Fifth Amendment
Geraldine Tyler, a ninety-three-year-old homeowner, owed Hennepin County, Minnesota, nearly $12,700 in delinquent property taxes,...
Courthouse Steps Preview: Tyler v. Hennepin County
The Supreme Court Decides Whether Government Taking of Surplus Proceeds from a Tax-Foreclosure Sale Violates the Fifth Amendment
Geraldine Tyler, a ninety-three-year-old homeowner, owed Hennepin County, Minnesota, nearly $12,700 in delinquent property taxes,...
In Tyler v. Hennepin County, the Supreme Court Will Decide Whether the Government Violates the Takings Clause When It Keeps Surplus Proceeds of a Tax-Foreclosure Sale
When a homeowner is delinquent in paying property taxes, the local government can foreclose on...