Facts of the Case
During Tommie Granville and Brad Troxel's relationship, which ended in 1991, they had two daughters. Until Brad's suicide in 1993, Brad's parents Jenifer and Gary Troxel, the paternal grandparents, had regularly seen their granddaughters on weekends. However, after Brad's suicide, Granville informed the Troxels that she wished to reduced their visitation time to one short visit per month. The Troxels filed suit for the right to visit their grandchildren, under section 26.10.160(3) of the Revised Code of Washington, which permits "any person" to petition for visitation rights "at any time" and authorizes state superior courts to grant such rights whenever visitation may serve a child's best interest. Granville did not oppose the petition outright but did oppose the amount of visitation time sought by the Troxels. Subsequently, a Washington Superior Court ordered more visitation than Granville desired. On appeal, the Washington Court of Appeals reversed that decision, holding that non-parents lacked standing to sue under the statute. In affirming, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that the statute unconstitutionally interfered with parents' right to rear their children.
Questions
Does the Washington statute, which allows any person to petition for a court-ordered right to see a child over a custodial parent's objection if such visitation is found to be in the child's best interest, unconstitutionally interfere with the fundamental right of parents to rear their children?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In a 6-3 decision delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that the Washington Statute violated the right of parents, under the due process clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children. Justice O'Connor wrote for the Court that "[t]he liberty interest at issue in this case -- the interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children -- is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court." Justices John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy dissented.
Religious Liberty, Parental Rights, and the Challenges Posed by the Transgender Movement
In Troxel v. Granville, a plurality of the Supreme Court described parental rights as “perhaps the...
Religious Liberty, Parental Rights, and the Challenges Posed by the Transgender Movement
In Troxel v. Granville, a plurality of the Supreme Court described parental rights as “perhaps the...
The Time Is Ripe to Disincorporate the Establishment Clause
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
The Supreme Court’s 1947 incorporation of the Establishment Clause[1] through the Due Process Clause of...
Parental Rights and “Social Transitions” at School: Mead v. Rockford Public School District
When a child struggles with gender dysphoria, many public schools will intentionally and actively conceal...
Parental Rights and Religious Liberty: Examining New Conflicts Between Parents and the State
The Supreme Court has articulated that parents have the unenumerated right rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment...
Parental Rights and Religious Liberty: Examining New Conflicts Between Parents and the State
The Supreme Court has articulated that parents have the unenumerated right rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment...
Religious Liberty and Education: Kennedy, Carson, and Parental Rights
2022 National Lawyers Convention
This panel discussion will examine public and private education, with a focus on the relationship—and...
Religious Liberty and Education: Kennedy, Carson, and Parental Rights
2022 National Lawyers Convention
This panel discussion will examine public and private education, with a focus on the relationship—and...
Incorporation through the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Since the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the Supreme Court has incrementally incorporated...
Parental Law in the States: Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania
This article reviews recent state court cases in the area of family law which concern...