Facts of the Case
Petitioner Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) sued the University of North Carolina (UNC) over its admissions process, alleging that the process violates the Fourteenth Amendment by using race as a factor in admissions. UNC admits that it uses race as one of many factors in its admissions process but argues that its process adheres to the requirements for race-based admissions outlined in the Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger.
After an eight-day bench trial and litigation that spanned nearly seven years, the district court ruled that UNC’s admissions policy survived strict scrutiny and was consistent with Grutter v. Bollinger. SFFA appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed.
The case was originally consolidated for oral argument with a similar case challenging the admissions policies at Harvard University under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but the Court subsequently severed the two cases.
Questions
May institutions of higher education use race as a factor in admissions?
If so, does UNC’s race-conscious admissions process violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution?
Conclusions
-
The University of North Carolina admissions program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
From the Department of Education, With Love: Valentine’s Day “Dear Colleague” Missive Forces ABA to Reassess Law School Diversity Standard
The U.S. Department of Education recognizes the Council of the ABA Section of Legal Education...
The Widening Effect of Students for Fair Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 26
Sitting at the top of the judicial pyramid, the Supreme Court makes only a few...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
Marlean Ames, a straight woman, was denied promotion and later demoted in her role at...
New Voices in Civil Rights: How Universities are Responding to SFFA
Institutions of higher education released demographic data for their first classes admitted after the Supreme...
Military Academies Litigation After SFFA
Last year, the Supreme Court decided the cases of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard...
The ABA's Micromanagement of Law Schools
At next month’s National Lawyers Convention, the Professional Responsibility and Legal Education Practice Group will...
Explainer Episode 75 - Defining the Term "Equity" from a Legal and Historical Standpoint
In this episode, experts GianCarlo Canaparo and Mike Gonzalez provide a legal and historical interpretation of the...
The Twin Commands: Streamlining Equality Litigation Based on Students for Fair Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
Each year, government contracting programs dole out tens of billions of dollars to businesses that...
CLE: Is DEI Legal After The Harvard Case?
CLE credit for this event is available at On-Demand CLE. DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) initiatives...
The Real Story Behind the Demographic Swings in MIT Admissions
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) became the first highly selective college to release data...
Nuziard v. MBDA: What is the Future of Equal Protection Litigation?
On March 5, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of...
Discrimination By Proxy?: Arlington Heights Cases in the Post Students for Fair Admissions Era
In the consolidated Students for Fair Admissions cases, the Supreme Court held unlawful the use of race...
Racial Preferences in Economic Benefits: From Widely Accepted to Legally Indefensible
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
As the United States began to emerge from its long history of legal segregation and...
Litigation Update: De Piero v. Pennsylvania State University: DEI & Hostile Work Environments Under Title VII
Professor Zack De Piero was an English professor at the Pennsylvania State University Abington campus...
Open Minds with Jonathan Mitchell and James Burnham - Part II
In the second part of this interview, James Burnham and Jonathan Mitchell discuss areas where...
“Oral-argument Affirmative Action?" Nonprofit’s Ethics Complaint Against Three Federal Judges Raises Questions on the Judicial Role
Do federal judges violate judicial ethics codes and the constitutional equal protection guarantee when they...
Race at Work: Can Businesses Treat People Differently on the Basis of Race?
In June of last year, the Supreme Court held that consideration of applicants’ race in...
Contracts, Labor & Employment Law After SFFA
In June the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Students for Fair Admissions Inc....
College Admissions After SFFA
On Thursday, June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Students for...
DEIA Initiatives in the Workplace Post-SFFA
In June, the Supreme Court held that consideration of applicants’ race in admissions decisions of...
Litigation Update: Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. Weber
Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. Weber is a challenge to California’s Assembly Bill 979...
New Guidance Documents from the Department of Education and Department of Justice Address Race-Based Decision-Making by Schools
In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decisions in SFFA v. Harvard and...
Litigation Update: Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
Fairfax County, Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology – commonly known as...
Attorneys General Clash Over What SFFA Decisions Mean For Employer DEI Programs
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its blockbuster opinions in two cases involving...
DEI in the Executive Branch
Join us on Tuesday, September 19th, at 12:00 PM ETfor a special lunch panel sponsored...
Reversed: The Court Ends Affirmative Action
On June 29, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Students for Fair Admissions...
Courthouse Steps Decision: SFFA v. Harvard
On Thursday, June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Students for Fair...
"The Diversity Lie" 20 Years Later
In 2003, Professor Brian Fitzpatrick published a piece titled "The Diversity Lie" in which he...
Explainer Episode 43 - An Agenda for Congress
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
In this episode, Hon. Gail Heriot, discusses her recent article for the New Criterion, An Agenda...
SFFA v. Harvard - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Curt Levey, Amanda Shanor, Devon Westhill
On October 31, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President...
Race-Based Admissions: Student Lawsuits Against Harvard and UNC Move Forward - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
In 2014, the Students for Fair Admissions ("SFFA"), a membership organization comprised of students, parents,...
Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fisher v. University...
ner 66Explainer 56 - Affirmative Action in Employment
Affirmative action plans, though perhaps most associated with college admissions and higher education, actually crop...
2024 Education Law & Policy Conference
A New Civil Rights Movement in Education?
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036
College Admissions: Fair or Fixed?
Teleforum
