Facts of the Case
In early January 2022, Nikki Taylor, a supervisor at a Memphis Starbucks, initiated union-organizing efforts, contacting Buffalo, New York, Starbucks employees and the Union for guidance. Conversations with colleagues about unionizing led to managerial scrutiny and disciplinary actions against Taylor for alleged insubordination and a dress code violation. Despite this, Taylor and coworkers held a meeting with Union representatives and drafted a letter to Starbucks's CEO announcing their intent to unionize.
On January 18, following the public release of the unionization letter, the Memphis store was closed early by management under the pretext of understaffing, coinciding with a media event covering the unionization efforts. Subsequent investigations by Starbucks led to the February 8 firing of seven employees, including key organizing committee members, for policy violations during the media event. These terminations led to a reduced display of union support among the remaining staff and increased anxiety about unionizing in other Starbucks locations. However, the Memphis store voted to join the Union in June.
The Union filed charges against Starbucks for unfair labor practices. Following an investigation, a district court ordered a temporary injunction, demanding the reinstatement of the terminated employees. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed, finding that the NLRB satisfied its burden of showing “‘reasonable cause’ to believe that employers engaged in unfair labor practices and that an injunction protects the Board’s remedial power.”
Questions
What test must courts use to evaluate requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act?
Litigation Update: United Natural Foods v. NLRB
NLRB Deference, Do Federal Rules Apply to the NLRB, and More
This litigation update will discuss the United Natural Foods case, where a new National Labor...
Agency Exuberance: A Flaw or Feature in Labor and Employment Law?
Ours are not the only authors to note that the substantive work of federal agencies has...
New Voices in Administrative Law II: The Supreme Court and Federal Court Jurisdiction
The development of standing jurisprudence has been inextricably intertwined with the growth of the administrative...
The Death of Deference: Supreme Court Overrules the Chevron Doctrine
In a move long anticipated by many court watchers, the Supreme Court on June 28,...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney sits at an interesting intersection of labor and administrative law. The...
Starbucks v. McKinney: The Supreme Court Taps the Brakes on Injunctive Relief for the NLRB
Federal agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney sits at an interesting intersection of Labor and Administrative law. The...
A Seat at the Sitting - April 2024
The April Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
