Facts of the Case
George Jarkesy established two hedge funds, with Patriot28 as the investment adviser, managing $24 million in assets from over 100 investors. The SEC initiated an investigation in 2011, eventually bringing an in-house action alleging fraud under multiple acts. Jarkesy challenged the SEC’s proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, citing constitutional infringements, but both the district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied the injunction, finding that the district court lacked jurisdiction.
After an evidentiary hearing by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Jarkesy was found guilty of securities fraud. Jarkesy sought review by the Commission, and while that petition was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lucia v. SEC, holding that SEC ALJs were improperly appointed. Jarkesy, however, waived his right to a new hearing. The Commission affirmed the fraud findings, imposed penalties, and rejected several constitutional arguments. He then filed a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which reversed and remanded, finding multiple constitutional violations.
Questions
Does the statutory scheme that empowers the Securities and Exchange Commission violate the Seventh Amendment, the nondelegation doctrine, or Article II of the U.S. Constitution?
Conclusions
-
When the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the 6-3 majority opinion of the Court.
First, the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial applies to this SEC enforcement action. The claims are "legal in nature" and closely resemble common law fraud actions. The substance of the claim matters more than its statutory origin or which branch of government brings the action. Moreover, the civil penalties sought are punitive in nature, which is a type of remedy traditionally provided by courts of law rather than courts of equity.
Second, the "public rights" exception to the Seventh Amendment does not apply here because this case does not fall within the narrow categories of matters that have historically been exclusively determined by the executive and legislative branches. The mere facts that Congress assigned the matter to an agency and that the government is the plaintiff do not change this outcome. Unlike the novel regulatory scheme in Atlas Roofing, these SEC fraud claims have close analogues in traditional common law actions that were historically adjudicated by courts with juries.
Because this action is essentially a common law fraud suit seeking punitive remedies, it must be heard by an Article III court with a jury, despite Congress assigning it to an administrative proceeding. This conclusion preserves the constitutional separation of powers and the role of juries in adjudicating traditional legal claims.
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored a concurring opinion, in which Justice Clarence Thomas joined.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined.
What Will the New Lockean Revolution of Limiting the Power of the Regulatory State Mean for Businesses?
A new Lockean revolution is going on in the Supreme Court. In recent years, the...
The Supreme Court's 2023 Term: Return to Original Meaning or a Dangerous "Paradigm Shift"?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 26
Each Supreme Court term over the past several years seems to produce more momentous decisions...
Will the Supreme Court Finally Address the Private Nondelegation Doctrine?
The Supreme Court is poised to tackle a key separation of powers issue this term:...
Federalism & Separation of Powers: A Revival of the Separation of Powers at the Supreme Court?
2024 National Lawyers Convention
The Supreme Court’s most recent term was one of significance with respect to the separation...
Federalism & Separation of Powers: A Revival of the Separation of Powers at the Supreme Court?
2024 National Lawyers Convention
The Supreme Court’s most recent term was one of significance with respect to the separation...
Does Jarkesy Doom the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act?
Reducing the cost of prescription drugs has been a bipartisan priority for years. One recent...
Does Jarkesy Doom the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act?
Reducing the cost of prescription drugs has been a bipartisan priority for years. One recent...
Agency Exuberance: A Flaw or Feature in Labor and Employment Law?
Ours are not the only authors to note that the substantive work of federal agencies has...
Agency Exuberance: A Flaw or Feature in Labor and Employment Law?
Ours are not the only authors to note that the substantive work of federal agencies has...
A Debate on Separation of Powers: Was SEC v. Jarkesy Rightly Decided?
The Regulatory Transparency Project and the Federalism & Separation of Powers practice group hosted a...
A Debate on Separation of Powers: Was SEC v. Jarkesy Rightly Decided?
The Regulatory Transparency Project and the Federalism & Separation of Powers practice group hosted a...
United States v. Pheasant: Oral Argument Held In Important Nondelegation Challenge
A Ninth Circuit panel (Judges Bea, Bennett, and Miller) recently heard oral argument in United...
The Curtain Falls on Chevron: Will the Chevron Two-Step Give Way to a Simpler Loper Bright-Line Rule?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
Traditionally, administrative law cases don’t make news. Instead, they make snooze. They can be exciting...
FCC Enforcement Bureau Reform
The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy will have significant impacts on agency authority in the...
“Tough Luck, Get a New Statute”
The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy essentially means that administrative agencies cannot directly...
“Tough Luck, Get a New Statute”
The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy essentially means that administrative agencies cannot directly...
SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
Devin Watkins
On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 6-3 opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy. The...
The Supreme Court’s Jarkesy Decision Sheds Light on the SEC’s Hidden Advantages
The Supreme Court’s momentous decision in SEC v. Jarkesy provides us with a rare glimpse...
The Supreme Court’s Jarkesy Decision Sheds Light on the SEC’s Hidden Advantages
The Supreme Court’s momentous decision in SEC v. Jarkesy provides us with a rare glimpse...
Jarkesy & the FCC’s ALJ Process
By all accounts, the closing days of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 term resulted in...
Jarkesy & the FCC’s ALJ Process
By all accounts, the closing days of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 term resulted in...
Courthouse Steps Decision: SEC v. Jarkesy
On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy. The...
Courthouse Steps Decision: SEC v. Jarkesy
On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy. The...
The Death of Deference: Supreme Court Overrules the Chevron Doctrine
In a move long anticipated by many court watchers, the Supreme Court on June 28,...
The Death of Deference: Supreme Court Overrules the Chevron Doctrine
In a move long anticipated by many court watchers, the Supreme Court on June 28,...
Simple Rules for Jarkesy v. SEC in a Complex Administrative World
“Administrative law is not for sissies,” Justice Scalia famously quipped. It’s complex. And that’s no...
Simple Rules for Jarkesy v. SEC in a Complex Administrative World
“Administrative law is not for sissies,” Justice Scalia famously quipped. It’s complex. And that’s no...
How Will the Supreme Court’s Admin Law Decisions Affect the FCC?
Last term, in Axon Enterprise v. FTC and SEC v. Cochran, the Supreme Court held...
How Will the Supreme Court’s Admin Law Decisions Affect the FCC?
Last term, in Axon Enterprise v. FTC and SEC v. Cochran, the Supreme Court held...
SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Margaret A. Little
On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission...
Congress and the Future of Agency Authority: A Discussion of Three Major Administrative Law Cases and Their Implications for Congress
The Federalist Society's Capitol Hill Chapter and the Regulatory Transparency Project invite you to join...
What Do the NLRB’s Administrative Law Judges’ Decisions Tell Us About the Fairness of the Board’s Procedures?
Twenty-three of the National Labor Relations Board’s 36 Administrative Law Judges (64%) were Board attorneys...
Which National Labor Relations Board Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings Deprive Employers of Jury Trial Rights?
A running gag in American movies, stemming from a line in the 1948 film “Treasure...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: SEC v. Jarkesy
On November 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in SEC v....
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: SEC v. Jarkesy
On November 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in SEC v....
Should NLRB Administrative Law Judges Pursue Other Opportunities?
On November 29, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about the constitutionality of...
The Labor Law Enigma: Article III, Judicial Power, and the National Labor Relations Board
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
Axon Enterprises v. FTC[1] wasn’t supposed to be about labor law. In fact, it wasn’t...
The Demise of the SEC’s Adjudication System
This post was originally published at Notice & Comment. Earlier this month on a Friday...
The Demise of the SEC’s Adjudication System
This post was originally published at Notice & Comment. Earlier this month on a Friday...
The Administrative State on Trial?
EBRXI
The Supreme Court continues to accept for review cases that challenge agency authority on separation...
The Administrative State on Trial?
EBRXI
The Supreme Court continues to accept for review cases that challenge agency authority on separation...
.jpg)
Deep Dive Episode 248 - Creatures of Statute III: Congress’ Responsibility to Answer the Major Questions
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
The Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project and Capitol Hill Chapter hosted the third in a...
Necessary & Proper Episode 81: Creatures of Statute III: Congress’ Responsibility to Answer the Major Questions
On October 17, 2022, the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project and Capitol Hill Chapter hosted...
Creatures of Statute III: Congress’ Responsibility to Answer the Major Questions
Join the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project and Capitol Hill Chapter for the third in...
Deep Dive Episode 232 - The Implications of Jarkesy v. SEC for Administrative Tribunals
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
In May, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a decision of the Securities...
The Implications of Jarkesy v. SEC for Administrative Tribunals
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
In May, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a decision of the Securities...
How Fifth Circuit Affirmed George Washington’s Vision of Fundamental Justice
The recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jarkesy v. SEC is...
How Fifth Circuit Affirmed George Washington’s Vision of Fundamental Justice
The recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jarkesy v. SEC is...
Congress Must Decide How to Choose Between Courts and Agency Adjudication
For some time, the Securities and Exchange Commission has had a choice of prosecutorial forums:...
Congress Must Decide How to Choose Between Courts and Agency Adjudication
For some time, the Securities and Exchange Commission has had a choice of prosecutorial forums:...
The Implications of Jarkesy v. SEC for Administrative Tribunals
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
Zoom Webinar
