Facts of the Case
High school students seeking support for their opposition to a United Nations resolution against Zionism set up a table in PruneYard to distribute literature and solicit signatures for a petition. A security guard told them to leave since their actions violated the shopping center's regulations against "publicly expressive" activities.
Questions
Did PruneYard's regulations violate the students' free speech rights?
Conclusions
-
Yes. Since the California Constitution protected "speech and petitioning, reasonably exercised, in shopping centers even when the shopping centers are privately owned," PruneYard could not prevent the students from soliciting on its property. The Court argued that it was within California's power to guarantee this expansive free speech right since it did not unreasonably intrude on the rights of private property owners.
The Spirit of the First Amendment Matters More than Ever in the Digital Age
In a 1999 Northwestern Law Review article, Professor Burt Neuborne noted that the First Amendment...
Recent State Cases Largely Support Property Rights
The state courts have continued to issue environmental law and property rights cases. Some support...