Facts of the Case
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Act Amendments of 1985 required states alone or in compacts with other states to dispose of such radioactive waste within their borders. New York State and Allegany and Cortland counties were frustrated in their compliance efforts by resistance from residents to proposed radioactive waste sites and a lack of cooperation from neighboring states. New York filed suit against the federal government, questioning the authority of Congress to regulate state waste management.
Questions
Does the Low-Level Waste Act violate the Tenth Amendment and the "guarantee clause" of Article Four?
Conclusions
-
In a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld two of the three provisions of the Act under review, reasoning that Congress had the authority under the Commerce Clause to use financial rewards and access to disposal sites as incentives for state waste management. The third provision, the "take-title" qualification, stipulated that states must take legal ownership and liability for low-level waste or by the regulatory act. "Either type of federal action," wrote Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, "would 'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments." This last provision violated the Tenth Amendment.
State Judiciaries and the Anticommandeering Doctrine
In the 1992 case New York v. United States, the Supreme Court applied the anticommandeering...
Constitutionality of Proposed Federal Liability Limitations for COVID-19 Exposure Claims
By Michael A. Carvin & Yaakov M. Roth Over the past weeks, the COVID-19 pandemic...
The Mythical McCulloch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A Review of The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of...
Sports Gambling Decision is a Major Victory for Federalism
This post has been contributed from The Volokh Conspiracy with permission by the author. Click...
Christie v. NCAA: Anti-Commandeering or Bust
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article argues that the Supreme Court should find unconstitutional the...
Does EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposal Violate the States’ Sovereign Rights?
Engage Volume 16, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan under...
Federalism Revived? The Printz and City of Boerne Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
The following program was sponsored by the Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Group at...
Printz v. United States
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
It is something of an annual tradition at the Supreme Court that each Term's biggest...
Dragooning State Officials into Federal Service
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In a century driven by the Progressive-Era view that ever-larger government can solve the manifold...