Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Topics
Brown v. City of Phoenix: Can Common Law Make Up for a Lack of Common Sense?
The city rain conjures a foul river of garbage, used needles, drug paraphernalia, and fetid...
Topics
Are Digital Bills of Rights A Sound Solution to Conflict Among Tech Companies, Consumers, and Government?
On December 15, 1791, ten states ratified the Bill of Rights to address concerns about...
Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Mark Chenoweth
On February 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases challenging the...
Topics
Are the Courts Rescuing the American Rescue Plan Act?
What is the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)? The American Rescue Plan Act is a...
A Seat at the Sitting - April 2023
The April Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
TeleforumGonzalez v. Google LLC - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Erik S. Jaffe
On February 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gonzalez v. Google LLC. After U.S....
Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America
Michigan State Student Chapter
East Lansing, MIFlorida Supreme Court Identifies Limits on Governmental Immunity Doctrines
Anna Goodman
In the recent decision Fried v. Florida, the Florida Supreme Court confronted the tension between...
Shaking Up the Law With Dobbs - An Evening with Scott Stewart
Nashville Young Lawyers
Nashville, TNPanel V: Is Judicial Review Democratic?
Tara Leigh Grove, James C. Ho, Lawrence Sager, Keith E. Whittington
Judicial Review has been criticized throughout American history as undemocratic, creating what has been known...