Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Judge.AI: A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence and Textualism
Catholic Student Chapter
Washington, DCTopics
Markel v. Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America: Welcome Developments in the Law of Church Autonomy
In its recent decision in Markel v. Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, the...
Topics
Garland v. Cargill: The Court’s Textualists Stick to Their Guns
Because it involves guns, Cargill v. Garland has been seen by supporters and opponents alike...
Is There a New Litigation Meta? Litigating in Front of Textualist and Originalist Courts
Northern Kentucky Student Chapter
Newport, KYIntroduction to Textualism with Professors Tara Leigh Grove and Todd Rakoff
Harvard Student Chapter
Cambridge, MATextualism in Alabama
Jay Mitchell
Textualism is alive and well in Alabama. This interpretive doctrine teaches that legal texts have...
What is the Future of Textualism?
Nicholas Bagley, William Baude, Emily Bremer, Gregory G. Katsas, Christopher J. Walker
Recently, the application of Textualism by the Supreme Court of the United States--the predominant method...
What is the Future of Textualism?
Nicholas Bagley, William Baude, Emily Bremer, Gregory G. Katsas, Christopher J. Walker
Recently, the application of Textualism by the Supreme Court of the United States--the predominant method...
What is the Future of Textualism?
TeleforumArizona Supreme Court Takes Aim at Legislative Intent in Tax Case
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Tunkey[1] concerned Arizona’s transaction privilege tax (“TPT”). The unanimous Arizona...