Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations
Sadie Rose Blanchard, Jud Campbell, Benjamin Chen, Tara Leigh Grove, Robert Leider, Tyler B. Lindley, Robert T. Miller, Luke J. Schumacher, Brian Gary Slocum, Keith E. Whittington, Christina M. Mulligan
Featuring: Prof. Sadie Blanchard, "Adjudicating ESG Reputation," Associate Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School...
Panel: The Future of Administrative Statutes
Eric R. Bolinder, Tara Leigh Grove, Joshua Kleinfeld, Brian Gary Slocum, Ilan Wurman
This panel will explore the Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright as well as its...
Environmental Law & Property Rights: Environmental Law in a Post-Chevron World— How Should Congress, Agencies, and States Respond?
Todd Aagaard, Thomas M. Hardiman, Lindsay See, Andrew Wheeler
This year, in a pair of decisions known as Loper Bright, the Supreme Court overruled...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Delligatti v. United States
Robert K. McBride
Delligatti v. United States concerns whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or...
Daniel Webster Debate Series: Should the Court Embrace the Major Questions Doctrine?
Louis J. Capozzi, Ronald M. Levin, Rodolfo Armando Ruiz
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter'sDaniel Webster Debate Series presents Daniel Webster Debate Series:Should the...
Ghosts of Chevron [The FedSoc Films Podcast]
Gary Lawson
In this episode of the FedSoc Films Podcast, Professor Gary Lawson of the University of...
What Does "New" Mean? Agency Action Post-Chevron
Jonathan Brightbill, Richard A. Epstein, Andrew Mergen, Robert V. Percival
Last term, the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. ...
Textualism and Patent Statutory Law – Patent Eligibility, ODP, and Upcoming Patent Reform in Congress
Matthew J. Dowd, Sherry Knowles, Gene Quinn, John M. Rogitz, Joshua Sarnoff
When it comes to patent eligibility and statutory construction, does “any” really mean “any?” In...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Garland v. VanDerStok
Peter A. Patterson
Garland v. VanDerStok concerns whether the ATF's 2022 update to its regulations under the Gun Control...
Daniel Webster Debate Series: Should the Court Restore Chevron?
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter'sDaniel Webster Debate Series presents Daniel Webster Debate Series:Should the...