Patent office

Courthouse Steps Decision Teleforum: Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP

Daniel L. Geyser

In Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP (Supreme Court, April 20, 2020), the Supreme Court held that...

Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

Daniel L. Geyser

featuring Daniel L. Geyser

On April 20, 2020, the Supreme Court released its decision in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies,...

The Deterioration of Appropriate Remedies in Patent Disputes

Geoffrey A. Manne, Kristian Stout, Julian Morris, Dirk Auer

Federalist Society Review, Volume 21

Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...

Courthouse Steps: Oil States and SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal

Matthew J. Dowd, Brian Pandya

Intellectual Property Practice Group and Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum

 Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group Has the administrative state gone too far into...

Appointments Clause Back in the Supreme Court: Patent Office Judges as Principal or Inferior Officers

Aditya Bamzai, John C. O'Quinn

Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Group Teleforum

Eleven months ago the Federal Circuit held that the Administrative Patent Judges who serve on...

The Supreme Court Tackles Patent Reform: Further Reflections on the Oil States Case after Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court

Richard A. Epstein

Federalist Society Review, Volume 19

Note from the Editor: This article provides alternative answers to some of the questions posed...

Administrative Cancellation of Patents: Regulatory Overreach at the Patent Office?

Paul R. Michel, Adam Mossoff, Arti K. Rai, Melissa F. Wasserman, Stephen F. Williams

Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference

The Sixth Annual Executive Branch Review Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, April 17 at the...