Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Topics
2023 National Lawyers Convention: Insurrection & the 14th Amendment
Editor's Note: On December 19th, 2023 the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Former President Donald Trump...
Topics
2023 National Lawyers Convention: Insurrection & the 14th Amendment
Editor's Note: On December 19th, 2023 the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Former President Donald...
Textualism in Alabama
Jay Mitchell
Textualism is alive and well in Alabama. This interpretive doctrine teaches that legal texts have...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Kody Cooper
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
Showcase Panel IV: Originalism and Precedent
Tara Leigh Grove, Bernadette Meyler, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Neomi Rao, Lawrence Solum
On November 16, 2019, the Federalist Society hosted the fourth showcase panel of the 2019...
Topics
2019 National Lawyers Convention Digital Survival Guide
This "Survival Guide" is your one-stop-shop for all things digital at the National Lawyers Convention....
Counting to Two Thirds: How Close Are We to a Convention for Proposing Amendments to the Constitution?
Robert G. Natelson
Note from the Editor: This article argues that, in aggregating applications from states to call...
Topics
A Look at Madison's Notes from the Constitutional Convention
This article was originally published in Law and Liberty. Click here to visit their website. ...
Panel 3: Religious Liberty after the USCCR Report
Marci A. Hamilton, Douglas Laycock, William P. Marshall, Michael Stokes Paulsen, William H. Pryor
In September, 2016, the United States Commission on Civil Rights released a report entitled Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling...
Panel 3: Religious Liberty after the USCCR Report
Marci A. Hamilton, Douglas Laycock, William P. Marshall, Michael Stokes Paulsen, William H. Pryor
In September, 2016, the United States Commission on Civil Rights released a report entitled Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling...