Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel V: Is Judicial Review Democratic?
Tara Leigh Grove, James C. Ho, Lawrence Sager, Keith E. Whittington
Judicial Review has been criticized throughout American history as undemocratic, creating what has been known...
California v. Texas - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
Jonathan H. Adler, Mario Loyola
On June 17th, 2021 the Supreme Court decided California v. Texas, a case which concerned...
Is Another Brand of Judicial Deference on the Chopping Block?
Robert T. Carney, Mark Chenoweth
This teleforum will focus on the sundry problems with so-called "Brand X deference," whose name...
Supreme Court Denies Review of Constitutional Challenge to CFPB
Sam Kazman
On Jan. 14 the Supreme Court denied the cert petition in State National Bank of...
Deference Doctrines and the Clean Water Act
Jonathan H. Adler, Timothy Bishop
Recently, Justices of the Supreme Court have called the Court’s deference jurisprudence into significant question....
The Constitutionality of Independent Agencies: The CFPB - Podcast
Peter Conti-Brown, Gregory Frederick Jacob
In April, the mortgage lender PHH Corporation challenged the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection...