Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
SOC! SIDEBAR: College Football
William H. Pryor
The Federalist Society's Student Division & Yale Law School Chapterpresent SOC! SIDEBAR:College Football featuring Hon....
Is the Supreme Court ‘Illegitimate'?
Kannon K. Shanmugam, Amelia Thorn
Event Audio: Is the Supreme Court ‘Illegitimate'?
Explainer Episode 75 - Defining the Term "Equity" from a Legal and Historical Standpoint
In this episode, experts GianCarlo Canaparo and Mike Gonzalez provide a legal and historical interpretation of the...
Panel III: Race in Admissions: How SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC are Changing Higher Education and the Legal Profession
Tracey Maclin, Cameron T. Norris, Meredith Sasso, Devon Westhill
The panel will discuss how these decisions are transforming the admissions process in higher education...
Remembering William Consovoy
Jenn L. Mascott, Thomas R. McCarthy, Todd J. Zywicki
Join the DC Young Lawyers Chapter and the George Mason Student Chapter for an evening...
SFFA and Beyond
Akhil Reed Amar, Gail L. Heriot, Randall Kennedy, Stephen Alexander Vaden, Devon Westhill
This year the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Students for Fair Admissions Inc....
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Originalist Perspectives on Ethics and the Supreme Court
David Lat, Jay Mitchell, Carrie Campbell Severino, David R. Stras
Article III of the Constitution vests the “judicial Power” in “one Supreme Court, and in...
Explainer 59 - Why (and How) Does OMB Classify Americans’ Race? A Brief History
David Bernstein
It may surprise some to know that the government has definitive racial classifications for Americans,...
Lockstep or Step Alone: Considering Interpretations of the Federal Constitution When Interpreting State Constitutions
Clint Bolick, Sarah Keeton Campbell, David R. Stras, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Sarah Hawkins Warren
Many state constitutional provisions are worded similarly to provisions of the federal Constitution. At times,...