Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation
Damien Schiff is a senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation. He leads its environmental practice group, a unique initiative that draws broadly from PLF’s expertise and success in property rights and separation of powers litigation. Over the years, Damien has represented hundreds of landowners and property rights advocates to defend their liberties against heavy-handed and unwarranted environmental and land-use regulation. His litigation experience includes Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a groundbreaking decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of landowners to challenge Clean Water Act compliance orders issued by EPA, and Contoski v. Norton, PLF’s successful effort to force the federal government to make good on its promise to delist the bald eagle from the Endangered Species Act.
Besides litigation, Damien has written academic articles on a variety of subjects, including the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, greenhouse gas torts, the duty to rescue, and international water law. He has appeared on a variety of television and radio programs and has been quoted in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Harper’s Magazine, and The Economist, among other publications.
He obtained his law degree magna cum laude from the University of San Diego School of Law, and his undergraduate degree magna cum laude from Georgetown University. While at USD, he was a research assistant for Professor Bernard Siegan, a leading constitutional theorist and advocate for property rights and economic liberty. Immediately prior to joining PLF, Damien clerked for Judge (and former PLF attorney) Victor Wolski of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Damien credits the mentoring and examples of Professor Siegan and Judge Wolski for his decision to pursue a career in liberty-based public interest litigation.
Damien lives in Sacramento with his wife, two young sons, four chickens, and a cat named Princess. In his off hours he enjoys stamp collecting, Gregorian chant, and martinis—preferably at the same time.
Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden was appointed as the Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture on July 7, 2025. Alongside Secretary Brooke L. Rollins, Deputy Secretary Vaden leads the Department’s operations and implements policies that support America’s food and farm systems. A native of Union City, Tennessee, Deputy Secretary Vaden brings expertise in agricultural policy, law, and rural development. Previously, he served as a judge on the U.S. Court of International Trade and as General Counsel of USDA. Throughout Deputy Secretary Vaden’s time as General Counsel, he led successful Supreme Court litigation, advanced regulatory reform, and supported the implementation of the 2018 Farm Bill. He is a graduate of Yale Law School and Vanderbilt University. A public servant with strong agricultural roots, Deputy Secretary Vaden is committed to revitalizing rural America and ensuring an abundant, affordable, and safe U.S. food supply.
Partner, FisherBroyles LLP
Paul Beard II is an environmental and land-use partner with FisherBroyles LLP.
JD/MPP student, NYU School of Law and the Harvard Kennedy School
Daniel Cheung was a 2015 summer law clerk with Alston & Bird and is presently a JD/MPP student at the NYU School of Law and the Harvard Kennedy School.
Topics
Administrative Law and Judicial Duty: Justice Thomas' Principled Stand Against Arbitrary Power
Few constitutional scholars would deny that the Supreme Court has made tragic—even shameful—errors in interpreting...
Topics
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.
Background Imagine you own a plot of land. You may want to build a house...
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc.: Wetlands Jurisdictional Determinations and the Right of Federal Judicial Review
Damien Michael Schiff
Note from the Editor: This article discusses U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes, a...
Topics
Enough Is Enough: Justice Scalia, Auer Deference, and Judicial Duty
It is one of the most fundamental principles of Anglo-American law: No person may be...
Is the Consumer Bureau "Data Driven"?
O.K., I know, not many people place much faith in the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). It...
E.P.A. Broke Law With Social Media Push for Water Rule, Auditor Finds
The New York Times reports: The Environmental Protection Agency engaged in “covert propaganda” and violated federal law...
Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association: Portending a Return to Judicial Engagement
Stephen Alexander Vaden
In a Term full of blockbuster cases considering the fate of Obamacare and establishing gay...
Transparency in the Intelligence Community
On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence Clapper announced a plan to implement a new set...
Tables Turn on Vague Campaign Finance Regulation
Stephen Klein has an interesting article on the Pillar of Law Institute's blog about FEC functionality, PACs,...
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA: A Foreshadowing of Things to Come?
Paul J. Beard, Daniel Cheung
On June 23, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Utility Air...