Partner, Wiley Rein LLP
Caleb focuses on advising participants in the political process on compliance with all aspects of political law, including campaign finance, government ethics, and lobbying. His clients include Fortune 50 corporations, trade associations and other business organizations, non-profit and tax exempt 501(c) advocacy organizations, federal officeholders, political candidates and committees, and private individuals. He has particular experience with the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA), the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), as well as analogous state and local laws regulating campaign finance, government ethics, and lobbying. Caleb frequently represents clients subject to these laws in matters before the Federal Election Commission (FEC), other federal and state administrative agencies, and in federal and state courts.
Chambers USA ranks Caleb in Band 1 as one of the nation’s leading lawyers in Political Law and notes: “In a word, he is exceptional. Caleb is able to quickly distill issues to their essence, is a true expert as well as being creative and pragmatic to consistently provide reliable and ethical advice." In addition, Caleb has appeared as a nationally broadcast commentator on CBS, Fox News, and National Public Radio. He is regularly cited and quoted on political law topics in The New York Times, The Washington Post, ABC News, Bloomberg Government, Time, Politico, The Huffington Post, The Daily Beast, Yahoo News, Salon, Roll Call, The Hill, Law360, The Washington Times, Washington Business Journal, and Washington Examiner.
Former Cincinnati City Councilman
P.G. Sittenfeld is a writer based in Cincinnati, Ohio, where he lives with his wife, Sarah, an oncologist, and their three young sons. Sittenfeld’s writing has appeared in America Magazine, The New York Times, The Princeton Alumni Weekly, Slate, and Cincinnati Magazine. Sittenfeld also serves as a storytelling collaborator on narrative projects for CEOs, lawyers, doctors, startup founders, and school administrators. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Oxford University in England, where he was a Marshall Scholar.
Previously, Sittenfeld served for nearly a decade on Cincinnati’s City Council, where he became the city’s highest vote-getter through a record of fostering economic growth and innovation as well as supporting the community’s most marginalized members. He was widely expected to become the city’s next and youngest-ever mayor when he was prosecuted on public corruption charges in 2020, stemming from an FBI sting operation later likened in court to a “prosecutorial Truman Show.”
Following Sittenfeld’s acquittal on four counts and conviction on two counts, Jones Day’s Issues and Appeals group took on his entire appeal pro bono, calling it “the most extreme prosecution based on lawful campaign donations in U.S. history.” A nearly unprecedented bi-partisan group of top White House, DOJ, and Judicial officials spanning the past four decades submitted amicus briefs in support of Sittenfeld’s innocence.
For four-and-a-half months in 2024, Sittenfeld was Inmate Number 18085-509 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Ashland, Kentucky, before the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals took the highly unusual step of ordering his early release pending the final outcome of his appeal. In May 2025, Sittenfeld and Jones Day were just days away from submitting a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court when Sittenfeld was granted a full and unconditional Presidential pardon.
Concerned about the far-reaching First Amendment implications of his prosecution and wanting to halt similarly misguided cases from being brought against other candidates or donors in the future, Sittenfeld and Jones Day decided to move forward with his appeal - marking the first known instance of an individual receiving a Presidential pardon and still being in a position to and choosing to move forward petitioning the Supreme Court. Sittenfeld regularly gives talks at law schools, faith forums, and in private sector settings on topics ranging from faith and resilience to American politics, personal liberties and government overreach, and the U.S. criminal justice system.
Assistant Solicitor General, Office of the Texas Attorney General
Senior Director, Liberty & National Security Program, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School
Elizabeth (Liza) Goitein is senior director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty & National Security Program.
Goitein is a nationally-recognized expert on presidential emergency powers, government surveillance, and government secrecy. Her writing has been featured in major newspapers and magazines including the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, The Atlantic Magazine, and The New Republic, and she has appeared frequently on MSNBC, CNN, and NPR. She has testified on several occasions before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees.
Before coming to the Brennan Center, Goitein served as counsel to Senator Russ Feingold, chairman of the Constitution Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and as a trial attorney in the Federal Programs Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. Goitein graduated from Yale Law School and clerked for the Honorable Michael Daly Hawkins on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In 2021–22, she was a member of the inaugural class of Senior Practitioner Fellows at the University of Chicago’s Center for Effective Government.
Senior Adviser, International Security Program, CSIS
Glenn S. Gerstell served as the general counsel of the National Security Agency (NSA) from 2015 to 2020. A frequent guest commentator on CNN, MSNBC, and NPR, he has written and spoken widely about the intersections of technology and national security, with articles appearing in the New York Times, Washington Post, New Yorker, The Hill, Barron’s, and POLITICO. Prior to joining the NSA, Mr. Gerstell practiced law for almost 40 years at the international law firm of Milbank, LLP, where he focused on the global telecommunications industry and was the managing partner of the firm's Washington, D.C., Singapore, and Hong Kong offices. Mr. Gerstell served on the President's National Infrastructure Advisory Council, the Future of Encryption Committee for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, and the District of Columbia Homeland Security Commission. A graduate of New York University and the Columbia University School of Law, Mr. Gerstell is an elected member of the American Academy of Diplomacy and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Earlier in his career, he was an adjunct law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and New York Law School. He is a recipient of the National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal, the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Civilian Service, and the NSA Distinguished Civilian Service Medal.
When Politics Becomes a Crime? The First Amendment Questions in Sittenfeld v. United States
Washington-St. Louis Student Chapter
St. Louis, MOTopics
Do Compelled Biometrics Violate the Fifth Amendment? A Deepening Split Among Lower Courts
Chief Justice Roberts remarked in 2014 that modern cell phones are “such a pervasive and...
Topics
Is ActBlue in Legal Peril?
Since its inception in 2004, the powerhouse Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue has made its mark...
Topics
Does Collective Bargaining Violate Article II? How the Unitary Executive Theory Could Transform the Federal Workforce
On January 17, 2025, three days before the presidency changed hands, the American Federation of...
Topics
New Report Fails to Vindicate Public Campaign Finance
Earlier this month, the progressive Brennan Center for Justice released a report on New York...
Texas Court Confronts Misleading Political Communications and the First Amendment
Daniel Ortner
Can states prohibit “misleading” political communications? Not if the First Amendment has anything to say...
Topics
Oral Arguments in Murthy v. Missouri
The Supreme Court looked unlikely to uphold a sweeping Fifth Circuit injunction on Monday, as...
Topics
Does Texas Have The Right to Defend Its Border?
The state of Texas has taken bold steps to secure its southern border and stem...
Reforming Section 702: Should the FBI require a warrant to search its database for the communications of US persons?
Elizabeth Goitein, Glenn Gerstell
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows the government to collect non-content metadata from communications service providers. Advocates for renewal, including members of the US intelligence community, argue that it is a critical tool for national security and failure to renew it will leave the nation vulnerable. Critics claim Section 702 creates a loophole that allows for the collection of personal information without a warrant. In this Briefcase, two experts, Glenn Gerstell and Liza Goitein, debate a key issue of reform, whether the FBI should require a warrant to search its database for the communications of US persons.
Topics
A First Amendment Bulwark Against a Ministry of Truth
As many know by now, on July 4 in Missouri v. Biden, U. S. District...