Shining Light on the “Separating Families” Propaganda
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Perhaps to distract from the devasting report from the Inspector General documenting extraordinary political bias and criminal conduct at the highest echelons of the FBI and Department of Justice during the prior administration, the major media has this week treated the nation to heart-wrenching (though often false) stories of children being separated from their parents as the Trump administration seeks to enforce the country’s immigration laws.
Many of the most incendiary photos were later demonstrated to date from 2014—the result of Obama administration enforcement efforts. And the new, cover-of-TIME-Magazine photo of a child crying, conveyed the patently false implication that she was being taken from her mother.
This is propaganda, pure and simple, at a level of effectiveness that would make even Joseph Goebbels envious. Our politics cannot survive if Soviet-style “truth” becomes the norm. Happily, two major articles out this week shine some much-needed light on the false narrative being pushed.
The first is by Hans von Spakovsky, published at The Daily Signal, titled “Who’s Responsible for Separating Alien Kids From Their Parents? Many People, but Not Trump.”
The second, by Ken Klukowski at Breitbart, is titled “Trump Executive Order Ending Family Separation Is Legal; Now Congress Must Act.”
Both are worth a read, and broad distribution.
Dr. John Eastman is the former Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service and former Dean at Chapman University's Dale E. Fowler School of Law, where he had been a member of the faculty since 1999, specializing in Constitutional Law, Legal History, and Property. He is a founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute that he founded in 1999. He has a Ph.D. in Government from the Claremont Graduate School and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School, and a B.A. in Politics and Economics from the University of Dallas. He serves as the Chairman of the Board of the National Organization for Marriage.
Prior to joining the Chapman law faculty, Dr. Eastman served as a law clerk to the Honorable Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, and to the Honorable J. Michael Luttig, Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and practiced law with the national law firm of Kirkland & Ellis. Dr. Eastman has also represented numerous clients in important constitutional law matters and has argued before the Supreme Court. On behalf of the Claremont Institute Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, he has participated as amicus curiae before the Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Courts of Appeals, and State Supreme Courts in more than one hundred cases of constitutional significance, including Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (the school vouchers case), Kelo v. New London, Ct. (eminent domain), and Van Orden v. Perry (the 10 Commandments case). He has also appeared as an expert legal commentator on numerous television and radio programs, including C-SPAN, Fox News, PBS, NewsHour, and The O'Reilly Factor.