Chevron v. NRDC (1984) and subsequent precedents held that courts should defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This judicial deference to administrative agencies, often called Chevron Deference has been a topic of great debate. Two experts, Mark Chenoweth and Ronald Levin, took on this debate via a variety of mediums -blogs, videos, etc. while additional experts chimed in with Amicus Briefs, culminating in an audience vote on which side convinced them.
Topics
Does the Trump Administration Have “Good Cause” to Skip Notice and Comment?
If we were purists, federal agencies would scarcely make rules at all. The Founders did...
Michigan Supreme Court Rules on Distinction Between Rules and Informal Policy Statements
Nicholas Holmes
When does an agency’s action carry the force of law and bind both the...
The Curtain Falls on Chevron: Will the Chevron Two-Step Give Way to a Simpler Loper Bright-Line Rule?
Ronald A. Cass
Traditionally, administrative law cases don’t make news. Instead, they make snooze. They can be exciting...
Topics
Texas District Court Sets Aside FTC's Ban on Non-Compete Agreements
In Ryan LLC v. FTC, decided on August 20, the U.S. District Court for the...
Topics
Corner Post and Loper Bright: Only certain plaintiffs can challenge old regulations in the post-Chevron world
When we filed Corner Post’s lawsuit in 2021, we didn’t expect to end up at...
Corner Post and 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a): Not Much to Look At?
Michael J. Showalter
This term the U.S. Supreme Court will decide Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors...
Navigating the Capital Adequacy Rule: Legal and Policy Perspectives
Peter Conti-Brown, Trent McCotter, Jeremy Newell, Randal K. Quarles, Eugene Scalia
Registration to attend this event in person is now closed. Join us on April 10, 2024,...
Navigating the Capital Adequacy Rule: Legal and Policy Perspectives
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
Should The Chevron Doctrine Stand?
Mark Chenoweth , Ronald M. Levin
Chevron v. NRDC (1984) and subsequent precedents held that courts should defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This judicial deference to administrative agencies, often called Chevron Deference has been a topic of great debate. Two experts, Mark Chenoweth and Ronald Levin, took on this debate via a variety of mediums -blogs, videos, etc. while additional experts chimed in with Amicus Briefs, culminating in an audience vote on which side convinced them.
The Labor Law Enigma: Article III, Judicial Power, and the National Labor Relations Board
Alexander T. MacDonald
Axon Enterprises v. FTC[1] wasn’t supposed to be about labor law. In fact, it wasn’t...