Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
The Supreme Court's 2023 Term: Return to Original Meaning or a Dangerous "Paradigm Shift"?
Zack Smith, Donald A. Daugherty
Each Supreme Court term over the past several years seems to produce more momentous decisions...
Alexander M. Bickel and the Future of Constitutional Law
Yale Student Chapter
New Haven, CTThe Legacy of Alexander M. Bickel
Yale Student Chapter
New Haven, CTPanel III: The Judicial Power and Evaluating Judicial Supremacy
Benjamin Beaton, John C. Harrison, Gary Lawson, Jeannie Suk Gersen, Amanda L. Tyler
New presidential administrations start with a flurry of administrative actions. These fresh rules, guidelines, and...
Panel I: Federalism and the Separation of Powers
Stephanos Bibas, Maureen Brady, Sarah Keeton Campbell, James E. Tierney, Ernest Young
It has been said that American-style split sovereignty provides the people a “double security” for...
Panel V: Is Judicial Review Democratic?
Tara Leigh Grove, James C. Ho, Lawrence Sager, Keith E. Whittington
Judicial Review has been criticized throughout American history as undemocratic, creating what has been known...
Should the “Hollow Core” of Constitutional Theory Be Filled with the Framers’ Intentions?
Stephen B. Presser
A Review of The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers, by...
In the Rush to Reform, Prudence Is Among the Highest Duties: How to Responsibly Reform Cash Bail
Craig Trainor
Over the last two decades, the politics of American criminal law has made strange bedfellows....
Last Hurrah for the Minimalist Court?
Donald A. Daugherty
A review of SCOTUS 2020: Major Decisions and Developments of the U.S. Supreme Court, edited...
The Morality of Consent - Podcast
Erwin Chemerinsky, James A. Haynes, John J. Park
The Federalist Society's Legal Classics Revisited series returns to the writing of Professor Alexander Bickel...