Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
2023 National Lawyers Convention
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Originalist Perspectives on Ethics and the Supreme Court
David Lat, Jay Mitchell, Carrie Campbell Severino, David R. Stras
2023 National Lawyers Convention
Article III of the Constitution vests the “judicial Power” in “one Supreme Court, and in...
Originalist Perspectives on Ethics and the Supreme Court
David Lat, Jay Mitchell, Carrie Campbell Severino, David R. Stras
2023 National Lawyers Convention
Article III of the Constitution vests the “judicial Power” in “one Supreme Court, and in...
Topics
Book Review: The People’s Justice
Justice Clarence Thomas. Few public figures have endured the pressure, press, and public responsibility of...
Topics
Procedure in Practice: Culley v. Marshall and the Future of Civil Asset Forfeiture
Experts on both sides of the civil forfeiture debate—Robert Johnson from the Institute for Justice...
Topics
The Second Amendment, From Bruen to Rahimi
On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v....
College Admissions After SFFA
Art Coleman, Cory R. Liu, Kenneth L. Marcus, William E. Trachman
On Thursday, June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Students for...
College Admissions After SFFA
Art Coleman, Cory R. Liu, Kenneth L. Marcus, William E. Trachman
On Thursday, June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Students for...
Courthouse Steps Preview: Culley v. Marshall
Stefan D. Cassella, Adam F. Griffin, Robert E. Johnson
Which Test is it Anyway? Civil Asset Forfeiture and the Right to a Prompt Post-Seizure...
Topics
SCOTUS Orders: Social Media, Guns, and Redistricting
Even as the Court prepares to hear argument next week in two cases exploring the...