Professor Bruce N. Cameron teaches Employment Discrimination with a Focus on Faith, Labor Law, and administers the Right to Work Practicum. Prior to coming to Regent, he spent over 30 years litigating religious freedom and constitutional law cases in the employment context. During that time, he never lost a Title VII religious accommodation case in court. He counseled employees in virtually every state as to their rights and formally represented clients in administrative or judicial proceedings in at least 25 states. Cameron is currently on staff with the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. This is his 47th year with the Foundation and his 16th year teaching at Regent Law.
Cameron was an Andrews Scholar, an intern with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and a member of the U.S. Department of Justice Honors Program. He was a member of the Virginia State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2015-2019). He is a member of the Accrediting Association of Seventh-day Adventist Schools, Colleges, and Universities; the Federalist Society, the Christian Legal Society, several state bars, and a number of federal bars, including the Bar of the U.S. Supreme Court. He has appeared frequently on television and radio shows, including appearances on Dr. Dobson’s Focus on the Family. His hobbies over the years are sports cars, motorcycles, sailing, and studying and teaching the Bible.
Courthouse Steps Preview: Tyler v. Hennepin County
John J. Bursch, Tony Francois, Nancie G. Marzulla
The Supreme Court Decides Whether Government Taking of Surplus Proceeds from a Tax-Foreclosure Sale Violates the Fifth Amendment
Geraldine Tyler, a ninety-three-year-old homeowner, owed Hennepin County, Minnesota, nearly $12,700 in delinquent property taxes,...
Topics
In Tyler v. Hennepin County, the Supreme Court Will Decide Whether the Government Violates the Takings Clause When It Keeps Surplus Proceeds of a Tax-Foreclosure Sale
When a homeowner is delinquent in paying property taxes, the local government can foreclose on...
Litigation Update: Apache Stronghold v. United States Goes En Banc at the Ninth Circuit
Anthony J. Ferate, Luke Goodrich, Adam F. Griffin
This case presents an intersection between Native Americans’ free exercise rights and the Government’s power...
Litigation Update: Apache Stronghold v. United States Goes En Banc at the Ninth Circuit
Anthony J. Ferate, Luke Goodrich, Adam F. Griffin
This case presents an intersection between Native Americans’ free exercise rights and the Government’s power...
Topics
The Biden Administration’s Approach to “Further Advancing Racial Equity” at U.S. EPA
On his first day as President, the first executive order President Biden signed was Advancing...
Litigation Update: Groff v. DeJoy: Religious Liberty in the Workplace?
Bruce N. Cameron, Blaine L. Hutchison, Stephanie Taub
Join Stephanie Taub, Bruce Cameron, Blaine Hutchinson for discussion on Groff v. Dejoy, which was...
Litigation Update: Groff v. DeJoy: Religious Liberty in the Workplace?
Bruce N. Cameron, Blaine L. Hutchison, Stephanie Taub
Join Stephanie Taub, Bruce Cameron, Blaine Hutchinson for discussion on Groff v. Dejoy, which was...
Clean Water Act – Forward to the Past?
Tony Francois, Kevin Minoli
The federal Clean Water Act regulates discharges to “navigable waters,” which the Act defines as...
Clean Water Act – Forward to the Past?
Tony Francois, Kevin Minoli
The federal Clean Water Act regulates discharges to “navigable waters,” which the Act defines as...
Litigation Update: United States v. Moore-Bush
Robert Frommer, Adam F. Griffin
Is long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home and curtilage a Fourth Amendment search?
In 2017, ATF agents placed a surveillance camera on a pole across the street from...