Natural Law Jurisprudence: A Primer

Natural Law Jurisprudence: A Primer

Professor Robert George presents a philosophical discussion about the nature of law. What do we mean when we speak about “law”? Is the concept of rights useful or confusing? What are the traditional or classical theories about jurisprudence?

Play the next video in the series?

Watch Now

7 of 9: Is the Natural Law Tradition Compatible with Precedent? [No. 86]

Professor Lee Strang explains that the concept of stare decisis is not necessarily in tension with the natural law tradition. Natural law provides a basis or a framework for interpreting the Constitution but practical applications of the law require ... Professor Lee Strang explains that the concept of stare decisis is not necessarily in tension with the natural law tradition. Natural law provides a basis or a framework for interpreting the Constitution but practical applications of the law require more detail than can be provided by the Constitution alone. Professor Strang discusses the example of how Congress and the Supreme Court used the few words of the interstate commerce clause to develop specific legal rules that governed relationships between the states.

Lee J. Strang is the John W. Stoepler Professor of Law & Values at the University of Toledo College of Law.

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Subscribe to the series’ playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWwcngsYgoUVycr2Nke5wFZB9jyeaaEjv

#law #no86 #lawstudent #lawstudents #jurisprudence #naturallaw