Recess Appointments Case Decided: NLRB v. Noel Canning

Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Courthouse Steps Teleforum

On June 26, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in NLRB v. Noel Canning. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court holds that recess appointments made in pro forma sessions are invalid. Please join us as our experts discuss the decision and its implications.

• Noel J. Francisco, Partner, Jones Day
• Prof. Kristin E. Hickman, Harlan Albert Rogers Professor in Law; Associate Director, Corporate Institute, University of Minnesota Law School
• Prof. Michael B. Rappaport, Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and Director, Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism, University of San Diego School of Law

On June 26, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in NLRB v. Noel Canning. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court holds that recess appointments made in pro forma sessions are invalid. Please join us as our experts discuss the decision and its implications.

• Noel J. Francisco, Partner, Jones Day
• Prof. Kristin E. Hickman, Harlan Albert Rogers Professor in Law; Associate Director, Corporate Institute, University of Minnesota Law School
• Prof. Michael B. Rappaport, Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and Director, Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism, University of San Diego School of Law

Call begins at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.