Our website is currently undergoing updates, some links may no longer work and content may change. Please check back soon.

Litigation Update: International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson

In International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court has been asked to review a Washington law that delays notification and reunification of a runaway child with his or her parents if that child claims to be receiving or requests gender-affirming treatment. The lower courts found that a group of parents (including one with a child who had run away before) lacked standing to challenge this law. The parents' petition to the Supreme Court will go before the Justices at an upcoming conference. Join us for a litigation update about this case and its broader implications for standing doctrine particularly in the context of parental rights and gender transition.

Featuring:

  • R. Shawn Gunnarson, Shareholder, Kirton McConkie
  • Prof. Derek Muller, Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School
  • (Moderator) Prof. Teresa Collett, Professor and Director, Prolife Center, University of St. Thomas School of Law

*******

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.