Michael Francisco

McGuireWoods, Partner

Michael Francisco is a member of the McGuireWoods' Government Investigations and White Collar practice. He is a proven public and commercial litigator with extensive appellate experience. In the courtroom or the boardroom, he tackles tough problems for clients by combining keen reasoning and research with practical understanding of government policy and regulations.

He represents clients on commercial and public litigation, trade and special issues litigation, strategic counsel, and appeals issues. Michael provides clients a wealth of knowledge when guiding clients through the legal process and helping them better understand their options in both litigation and through public policy advocacy. He relishes the opportunity to develop a well-crafted and strategic legal challenge for clients facing regulatory burdens.

Businesses, trade groups, and elected officials have relied on Michael’s deep appellate experience to advocate before courts of appeals at every level. He has argued four cases before the Colorado Supreme Court and successfully sought certiorari review on a wide range of issues. Michael has been counsel of record on thirteen briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court and participated in eighteen cases before the Colorado Supreme Court.

Prior to joining McGuireWoods, Michael was in private practice providing clients with years of litigation experience in dealing with tough issues involving civil litigation, strategic counseling, and appellate representation. He represented many clients from all types of industry groups including defense contracting, government and election officials, religious organizations, nonprofits, trade, energy and environmental industries.

Michael served as a law clerk to the Hon. Justice Neil Gorsuch in the U.S. Supreme Court from 2019 to 2020 and as a law clerk for Hon. Timothy M. Tymkovich in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit of Colorado from 2008 to 2009.

 

  • B.A., Hillsdale College, 2004
  • J.D., Cornell Law School, 2007

*****

A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.

Click to play: A Seat at the Sitting - March 2024

A Seat at the Sitting - March 2024

The March Docket in 90 Minutes or Less

Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...

A Seat at the Sitting - March 2024

A Seat at the Sitting - March 2024

The March Docket in 90 Minutes or Less

Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...

Click to play: Marijuana and the States: How Should Federalism Principles Inform the Federal Government'’s Response to State Marijuana Initiatives?

Marijuana and the States: How Should Federalism Principles Inform the Federal Government'’s Response to State Marijuana Initiatives?

Sponsored by the Center for Business Law and Regulation at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and the Practice Groups of the Federalist Society

In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law....

Marijuana and the States: How Should Federalism Principles Inform the Federal Government'’s Response to State Marijuana Initiatives?

Sponsored by the Center for Business Law and Regulation at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and the Practice Groups of the Federalist Society

In 2013 voters in Colorado and Washington legalized the possession of marijuana under state law....