John Elwood is the head of Arnold & Porter’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice. He has argued before the Supreme Court nine times, and appeared before most of the federal courts of appeals. He has successfully argued cases across a broad cross-section of subjects, with particular experience in environmental law, the False Claims Act, government contracting, and federal criminal law
Mr. Elwood’s work has earned him recognition as one of Washington’s top Supreme Court lawyers (Washingtonian, 2013), as one of “a small group of lawyers” with an “outsized influence at the U.S. Supreme Court” (Reuters, 2014), and as one of the country’s most innovative lawyers (Financial Times, 2014). Chambers USA reports that “[t]he much-admired John Elwood is praised for his advocacy skills” (2013), and describes Mr. Elwood as “phenomenal” (2014), “incredibly talented” (2012), and “a much-loved and widely respected lawyer who is quick on his feet” (2010).
Before joining the firm, Mr. Elwood served in senior-level positions in the U.S. Department of Justice. Beginning as an Assistant to the Solicitor General, and continuing with the firm, he has briefed more than 20 merits cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, and has briefed approximately 135 cases at the certiorari stage. As the senior Deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, he advised the White House and federal agencies on a range of constitutional, statutory, and regulatory issues.
- Yale Law School, J.D., 1993 (Senior Editor, Yale Law Journal)
- King's College, M.A. with distinction, first in class, 1990
- Princeton University, A.B. summa cum laude, 1989 (Phi Beta Kappa)
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
2024 SCOTUS Review: What do the Important Cases Mean for Congress?
Capitol Hill Club300 First St SE
Washington, DC 20003
Courthouse Steps Decision: Vega v. Tekoh
TeleforumPanel 3: Supreme Court Preview
Fifth Annual Kentucky Chapters Conference
Kentucky State Capitol House Chambers700 Capital Ave
Frankfort, KY 40601
Certiorari and Stinson Deference
Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group Teleforum
TeleforumSantos-Zacaria v. Garland - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
John Elwood
On January 17, the Court heard oral argument in Santos-Zacaria v. Garland. The case involves...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Vega v. Tekoh
On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Vega v. Tekoh. In a 6-3 decision, the...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Vega v. Tekoh
On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Vega v. Tekoh. In a 6-3 decision, the...
A Seat at the Sitting - March 2022
The March Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
A Seat at the Sitting - March 2022
The March Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...