Clark Neily is senior vice president for legal studies at the Cato Institute. His areas of interest include constitutional law, overcriminalization, civil forfeiture, police accountability, and gun rights. Neily is the author of Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution’s Promise of Limited Government. His writing has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and National Review Online, as well as various law reviews, including the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, George Mason Law Review, Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, NYU Journal of Law and Liberty, and Texas Review of Law and Politics. Neily is a frequent guest speaker and lecturer for the Federalist Society, Institute for Humane Studies, and American Constitution Society.
Before joining Cato in 2017, Neily was a senior attorney and constitutional litigator at the Institute for Justice and director of the Institute’s Center for Judicial Engagement. He is also an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law, where he teaches constitutional litigation and public-interest law.
Neily served as co-counsel in District of Columbia v. Heller, the historic case in which the Supreme Court held for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to own a gun for self-defense.
Neily began his legal career as a law clerk to Judge Royce Lamberth on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. After that he spent four years in the trial department of the Dallas-based firm Thompson & Knight. Neily received his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Texas, where he was Chief Articles Editor of the Texas Law Review.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
The Text, History, and Tradition of Economic Liberty in America
Cape Fear Lawyers Chapter
Cape Fear Country Club1518 Country Club Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403
The Intersection of NYSRPA V. BRUEN and Criminal Law
San Diego Lawyers Chapter
California Western School of Law - 2B350 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
The Intersection of NYSRPA v. Bruen and Criminal Law
California Western Student Chapter
California Western School of Law - Room 2B350 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
The Public Interest Lawyer’s Dilemma: Defending Rights You Don’t Love to Protect the Ones You Do
Los Angeles Lawyers Chapter
The Palm1100 S. Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Discussion on Qualified Immunity and Criminal Justice Reform
Nevada Student Chapter
The William S. Boyd School of Law4505 S Maryland Pkwy
Las Vegas, NV 89154
Should We Heed Pleas for Plea Bargaining Reform?
Although a right to trial is enshrined in the American Constitution, practically the nation’s criminal...
Should We Heed Pleas for Plea Bargaining Reform?
Although a right to trial is enshrined in the American Constitution, practically the nation’s criminal...
Feddie Night Fights: Criminal (In)Justice?: Is the Push for Decarceration & Depolicing Backfiring?
The Federalist Society’s Student Division & Boston College Law School Chapter present Feddie Night Fights:Criminal...
Courthouse Steps Decision Webinar: Lange v. California
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Teleforum
The Supreme Court issued its decision in Lange v. California on June 23, 2021. Lange was...
Courthouse Steps Decision Webinar: Lange v. California
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Teleforum
The Supreme Court issued its decision in Lange v. California on June 23, 2021. Lange was...