Vice President and Legal Director, National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc.
William Messenger is Foundation Vice President and Legal Director. He was a staff attorney for over twenty years and, during that time, represented individuals in numerous cases that sought to expand worker freedom of choice. This includes acting as lead counsel in three cases before the United States Supreme Court. In 2018, Messenger argued Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, where the Supreme Court held it violates the First Amendment for governments and unions to compel individuals to financially support unions and their speech. Originally from Youngstown Ohio, Messenger attended Ohio University as an undergraduate and then the George Washington University School of Law.
Senior Fellow, R Street Institute
Prior to R Street, Adam spent 12 years as a senior fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Before the Mercatus Center, he served as the president of the Progress and Freedom Foundation. Adam has also worked for the Adam Smith Institute, the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute.
Adam has published 10 books on a wide range of topics, including online child safety, internet governance, intellectual property, telecommunications policy, media regulation and federalism.
In 2008, Adam received the Family Online Safety Institute’s “Award for Outstanding Achievement.”
Gordon Rosen Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of Law 
Professor Horwitz teaches law and religion, constitutional law, and legal profession. He received his B.A. in English Literature from McGill Universtiy in Montreal in 1990, M.S., with honors, in Journalism from Columbia University in 1991, LL.B. from the University of Toronto in 1995 where he was co-editor-in-chief of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, and LL.M. from Columbia Law School in 1997. Professor Horwitz clerked for the Honorable Ed Carnes of the United Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Before joining the University of Alabama, Professor Horwitz was an associate professor at the Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles. He has also been a visiting professor at the University of Iowa College of Law, the University of San Diego School of Law, and Notre Dame Law School. In addition to having written and spoken widely on issues of constitutional law, Professor Horwitz is a member of the popular legal blog Prawfsblawg.
Boston Harbor’s Unresolved Presumption
William L. Messenger
A project labor agreement (“PLA”) is a union collective bargaining agreement that all contractors must...
Oral Argument in Wyeth v. Levine Marks Change in Drug Litigation Preemption Debate
On November 3, 2008, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Wyeth v. Levine to...
The Discipline of Prosecutors: Should Intent be a Requirement?
The American prosecutor is an amalgam in terms of historical background. The office as it...
Monumentally Speaking: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum
In a case brought by a quirky religion against a small city council, Pleasant Grove...
Two Visions, Two Results
Most religious believers, whatever their age, see their minister once or twice a week for...
Equal Treatment for Religious Expression after Colorado Christian University v. Weaver
The Bush Administration conceived the so-called “Faith-Based Initiative” to leverage the eff orts of religious...
The FCC’s Stalled Attempt to Breathe Life into Commercial Leased Access of Cable Television
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, when the only way to get television programming was...
Broadcast “Fairness” in the Twenty-First Century
The broadcast Fairness Doctrine, which formally existed from 1949 to 1987, required broadcast licensees to...
FCC v. Fox and the Future of the First Amendment in the Information Age
Adam Thierer
On November 4th, 2008, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the potentially historic free...
Paul Horwitz reviews The Invisible Constitution by Laurence Tribe
Paul Horwitz
The Book of Hebrews tells us that faith is “the substance of things hoped for,...