Brad Watts, senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC), oversees the center’s day-to-day operations. He also leads the development and implementation of the Chamber’s U.S. and global intellectual property (IP) agenda to foster a political, legal, and economic environment where innovators and creators can invest in the next big thing for the benefit of Americans and the world.
Watts previously served as the Republican chief counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Intellectual Property. There he was responsible for planning and implementing Senator Thom Tillis’ (R-NC) and the Republican party’s legislative portfolio on all aspects of IP law.
In the 116th Congress, when Senator Tillis was chairman of the subcommittee, Watts served as majority chief counsel and staff director for the Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Intellectual Property. He was responsible for implementing the senator’s legislative and oversight agenda on all aspects of America’s innovation economy.
During Watts’ tenure as majority chief counsel, the subcommittee held 17 legislative and oversight hearings and multiple staff briefings on IP issues, ranging from the state of patent eligibility law in America to reforming the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. Under his leadership, the subcommittee passed the CASE Act, the Trademark Modernization Act, and the Protecting Lawful Streaming Act, three landmark bills that collectively represent the largest changes to IP law since the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.
Earlier, Watts was chief immigration counsel to then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA). He began his career with former Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) as a legislative counsel on the Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, handling civil rights and civil liberties law, general tort law, bankruptcy, telecommunications, and IP issues for the senator.
Courthouse Steps Decision: Mahmoud v. Taylor
Eric Baxter, Teresa Stanton Collett
Mahmoud v. Taylor concerns the question of whether parents have the right to be notified...
20 Years Later: Kelo v. City of New London
J. Peter Byrne, Eric R. Claeys, Wesley W. Horton, Timothy Sandefur, Ilya Somin
In June of 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Kelo v. City of New...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency
Jeff Beelaert, Eli Nachmany
In 2019, the Environmental Protection Agency withdrew California’s previously-granted waiver to implement its Advanced Clean...
Litigation Update: Legal Developments Surrounding Tithing and Religious Donations
Daniel Blomberg, James C. Phillips
In recent years, a flurry of lawsuits has been launched nationwide against religious organizations, raising...
FCC Council on National Security
Megan L. Brown, Adam Chan
Early in his Chairmanship, Federal Communications Chair Chairman Brendan Carr established a new Council for...
Courthouse Steps Decision: EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and Oklahoma v. EPA
James Conde, Garrett Kral
On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court released its decisions for two circuit splits arising...
Medicare's New Drug Price Mandate: Healthcare & Innovation Implications
Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Adam Mossoff, Dan Troy, Brad Watts
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
On January 17, the Biden-Harris Administration added 15 new drugs, including Ozempic, to the list of...
Courthouse Steps Decision: United States v. Skrmetti
Erin M. Hawley, Ilya Shapiro
In the last several years, numerous minors who identify as transgender have undergone surgery and...
Antitrust in the College Sports Arena
Jodi S. Balsam, Kaitlyn Barry, Erik J. Clark, Rakesh Kilaru
In 2020, several collegiate athletes filed suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) arguing...
Checks and Balances: Deregulation Based on Supreme Court Rulings
Craig E. Leen, John Lewis, Jonathan Wolfson
Among the points emphasized by the second Trump administration has been a major push for...