"Chevron Bias" and the Administrative State
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Mark your calendars for the American Bar Association's debate, "Chevron Bias" and the Administrative State on June 15 at 5 p.m.:
In his recent book, Is Administrative Law Unlawful?, Professor Philip Hamburger argued that judicial deference to administrative interpretation violates judges' constitutional duty to independently decide cases. Building on his book's argument that Chevron deference "is an abandonment of judicial office," Prof. Hamburger writes in a forthcoming article that "Chevron deference" is in fact "Chevron bias," a systemic bias in favor of the government against Americans.
Prof. Hamburger will discuss his view of Chevron with an esteemed scholar and practitioner of administrative law, Professor David Vladeck. In addition to his scholarship, Prof. Vladeck directed the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection for four years. He is a Senior Fellow of the Administrative Conference of the United States, and an elected member of the American Law Institute.
The discussion will be led by Judge Randolph of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Free for Section Members. $15 Non-Members.
Professor of History, Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center
KC Johnson is professor of history at Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center, where he has taught since 1999. He has written 13 books on topics in U.S. political history, U.S. foreign policy, and legal and policy debates surrounding campus due process and civil liberties. His Duke lacrosse case blog, Durham-in-Wonderland, was named ABA Journal’s Best Ethics Blog in 2007; and he continues to blog on higher-ed matters at the blog Minding the Campus.
Assistant Director, Practice Groups, The Federalist Society