Facts of the Case
After the applications of two blacks were rejected by the District of Columbia Police Department, the two men filed suit against Mayor Walter E. Washington. The men alleged that the Department's recruiting procedures, including a written personnel test, discriminated against racial minorities. They claimed that the test was unrelated to job performance and excluded a disproportionate number of black applicants.
Questions
Did the recruiting procedures violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the procedures and written personnel test did not constitute racial discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause. The Court found that the Clause was designed to prevent official discrimination on the basis of race; laws or other official acts that had racially disproportionate impacts did not automatically become constitutional violations. The Court reasoned that the D.C. Police Department's procedures did not have discriminatory intent and were racially neutral measures of employment qualification.
In the Rush to Reform, Prudence Is Among the Highest Duties: How to Responsibly Reform Cash Bail
Over the last two decades, the politics of American criminal law has made strange bedfellows....
Escaping the Goldilocks Problem: A Proposal That Would Enable States to Avoid Redistricting Litigation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Partisan Gerrymandering and Party Rights: Why Gill v. Whitford Undermines All Future Partisan-Gerrymandering Claims
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gill v. Whitford...
Stormans v. Wiesman: Paths to Strict Scrutiny in Religious Free Exercise Cases
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about Stormans v. Wiesman, a case from the 9th...
Is the Disparate Impact Doctrine Unconstitutionally Vague?
Due process requires that a statute apprise a person of reasonable intelligence of the nature...
The Parade of Horribles Lives: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Schuette v....
OCR's Testing (Mis)Guidance: Anti-Education, Anti-Civil Rights
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 3, Winter 2000
The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights ("OCR") has decided to wade into...
Federalism Revived? The Printz and City of Boerne Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
The following program was sponsored by the Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Group at...
