Facts of the Case
Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade high school student, carried a concealed weapon into his San Antonio, Texas high school. He was charged under Texas law with firearm possession on school premises. The next day, the state charges were dismissed after federal agents charged Lopez with violating a federal criminal statute, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The act forbids "any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that [he] knows...is a school zone." Lopez was found guilty following a bench trial and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and two years' supervised release.
Questions
Is the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act, forbidding individuals from knowingly carrying a gun in a school zone, unconstitutional because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause?
Conclusions
-
Yes. The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.
A Federal Gestational Age Abortion Ban is the Wrong (and Unconstitutional) Hill for the Pro-Life Movement to Die On
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, decided in June 2022, the Supreme Court overruled...
Revitalizing the Nondelegation Doctrine
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
A Review of The Administrative State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation Doctrine (Peter...
The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium Is Unconstitutional
Note: This blog was originally posted at the Cato Institute's Cato at Liberty blog. ...
Constitutionality of Proposed Federal Liability Limitations for COVID-19 Exposure Claims
By Michael A. Carvin & Yaakov M. Roth Over the past weeks, the COVID-19 pandemic...
The Mythical McCulloch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A Review of The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of...
Liberty Month Revisited: Defining a Legitimate Scope for the Federalization of Business Crime
This month we are sharing a selection of paired pieces from The Federalist Society's Liberty...
Christie v. NCAA: Anti-Commandeering or Bust
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article argues that the Supreme Court should find unconstitutional the...
Decision Day Update
The Supreme Court released 5 more decisions this morning. Decisions in the other 3 cases...
People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Did Gonzalez v. Raich Eviscerate All Constitutional Limits on Federal Power?
Engage Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This article discusses an ongoing case questioning the constitutionality of the...
The “Mens Rea” Component Within the Issue of the Over-Federalization of Crime
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Introduction After decades of hastily passing federal criminal laws, the U.S. House of Representatives, through...
Sleeping Giant?: Section Two of the Thirteenth Amendment, Hate Crimes Legislation, and Academia’s Favorite New Vehicle for the Expansion of Federal Power
Engage Volume 13, Issue 3 October 2012
A brief look at the Thirteenth Amendment might suggest that it has rather limited application...
Testimony on the "Democracy Restoration Act"
Engage Volume 13, Issue 2, July 2012
Note from the Editor: This paper is based on testimony given by the author before...
Florida Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare: It All Comes Down to Broccoli
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This paper provides an update on the litigation dealing with the...
H.R. 3335: “The Democracy Restoration Act”
New Federal Initiatives Project
Brought to you by the Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group Last year, H.R. 3335,...
Individual Health Care Insurance Mandate Debate
Online Debate
Last Updated at 9 AM, Friday, November 6, 2009 This debate will focus on the following...
The War on Terrorism: Law Enforcement or National Security?
George Terwilliger*Theodore Cooperstein**Shawn Gunnarson***Daniel Blumenthal****Robert Parker***** The horrific events of September 11th were immediately labeled...
The Endangered Species Act: Does It Have a Stopping Point
In several recent decisions, the United States Supreme Court has held that Congress cannot use...
Hot Topics: Judicial Activism
When President George W. Bush announced his first nominations for the federal bench, he declared,...
Intellectual Property Rights and State Sovereign Immunity: The Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Intellectual Property Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 2, Summer 1999
On June 23, 1999, the last day of the most recent Supreme Court Term, the...
Congressional Control Over State Sovereign Immunity: The Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 1, Spring 1999
On June 23, 1999, the last day of the most recent Supreme Court Term, the...
Civil Suit Provision of Violence Against Women Act Found Unconstitutional by Fourth Circuit
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 1, Spring 1999
An en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit declared...
Printz v. United States
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
It is something of an annual tradition at the Supreme Court that each Term's biggest...
Dragooning State Officials into Federal Service
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In a century driven by the Progressive-Era view that ever-larger government can solve the manifold...
Separation of Powers and Federalism in the 104th Congress
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
In the fields of separation of powers and federalism the 104th Congress revisited old issues...