Facts of the Case
Saunders, a Kentucky citizen, sued Ogden, a Louisiana citizen, on a contract which Odgen, then a citizen of New York, had accepted in 1806. Saunders claimed that Odgen had not made payment on his obligation. Odgen claimed bankruptcy as his defense under the New York bankruptcy law enacted in 1801.
Questions
Does a state bankruptcy law applying to contracts made after the law's passage violate the Obligation of Contracts Clause of the Constitution?
Conclusions
-
No. This is not a violation of the Contracts Clause. The state law remains controlling. The obligation of a contract made after the enactment of a bankruptcy statute is subject to the bankruptcy statute provisions. In effect, the bankruptcy statute becomes part of all subsequent contracts, limiting their obligation but not impairing them.
Against Living Common Goodism
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Today I want to discuss a new version of an old debate. In 1985, then-Attorney...
Giving Credit for Shaping the Constitution
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
A review of: The Lives of the Constitution: Ten Exceptional Minds That Shaped America’s Supreme Law,...
Originalism and the Contract Clause
In Sveen v. Melin, decided on June 11, Justice Neil Gorsuch attempted to reopen an...
Forgotten Cases: Worthen v. Thomas and the Contract Clause
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the history of interpretation of the Contract Clause and...
