Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel III: Congress and the Administrative State: Prospects for Regulatory Reform
Nicholas Bagley, Emily Bremer, Jennifer Nou, Neomi Rao, Paul J. Ray
Featuring: Prof. Nicholas Bagley, Thomas G. Long Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School...
Panel: The Future of Administrative Statutes
Eric R. Bolinder, Tara Leigh Grove, Joshua Kleinfeld, Brian Gary Slocum, Ilan Wurman
This panel will explore the Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright as well as its...
A Short Introduction to Electronic Discovery
Ted Hirt
PowerPoint Slides This program will provide a short introduction to the world of E-Discovery,...
Topics
“It’s only words, and words are all I have to take your heart away"
This post originally appeared at Greenspoon Marder’s Intellectual Property blog. As a lawyer...
Topics
22nd Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture by Bari Weiss
On November 10, 2023, Bari Weiss, Founder and Editor of The Free Press, delivered the...
Textualism in Alabama
Jay Mitchell
Textualism is alive and well in Alabama. This interpretive doctrine teaches that legal texts have...
The Meaning of "Regulate Commerce" to the Constitution's Ratifiers
Robert G. Natelson
I. Previous Scholarship[1] A. Views of “Commerce”: Traditional and “Mega” The Constitution grants Congress power...
Against Living Common Goodism
William H. Pryor
Today I want to discuss a new version of an old debate. In 1985, then-Attorney...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Association
Justin Schwab
On April 27, 2021, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of HollyFrontier...
Did the Majority of Ohio Supreme Court Justices Signal the End of Chevron Deference?
Matthew R. Byrne, Julie E. Byrne
Ohio State ex rel. McCann v. Delaware County Board of Elections On first...