Her client experience in competition and antitrust is wide-scale and includes class action litigation, trade secret disputes, and defending clients in government investigations, grand jury subpoenas, and other proceedings. Lindsey enjoys working with her clients and with a variety of industry groups to help train their professionals regarding antitrust developments such as enforcement in critical areas, including procurement and labor. She is a thought leader regarding the evolution of criminal antitrust prosecution of no-poach agreements, and regularly trains and advises companies that do business with the government regarding increased risks from DOJ’s nascent Procurement Collusion Strike Force. Lindsey also works with clients as they assess competition concerns regarding potential business collaborations, such as teaming agreements and joint ventures.
In addition to representing defendants in cartel investigations and civil litigation, Lindsey also works with clients to prosecute and remedy antitrust harms they may incur. She currently represents 12 large shipping companies asserting claims against four Class I railroad companies in the In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. The V&E team has a leading role in spearheading the multi-district litigation and organizing strategy and discovery efforts across more than 300 plaintiffs.
A national thought leader, Lindsey co-chairs the ABA Antitrust Section’s Cartel & Criminal Practice Committee She often speaks on competition and has authored numerous articles deciphering the newest developments in antitrust enforcement to report on the potential implications.
She has been repeatedly recognized by Global Competition Review’s Who’s Who Legal as a rising star and future leader in Competition.
Lindsey maintains an active pro bono docket, which has included leading roles in several litigation matters, including advocating on behalf of the mother of a minor child in contested custody dispute in D.C. Superior Court, co-chairing a jury trial in a disability discrimination case brought in federal court in the District of Columbia, and leading an evidentiary hearing related to a Section 2255 petition in the Eastern District of Virginia. She regularly supervises V&E teams in cases involving housing conditions, landlord/tenant issues, and asylum.
Political Violence as a Threat to Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law
Claire Murray, Carrie Campbell Severino, Rachael Tucker Wyrick
The recent 8-year sentence of a would-be assassin who tried to kill Justice Brett Kavanaugh...
Political Violence as a Threat to Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law
IHC Update: Protecting Your Company from the Inside – Analyzing New Administration Policies, Opposing State AG Policies, and Internal Pressures
Kellen Dwyer, Jonathan L. Fahey, Joseph Moreno, Mark I. Pinkert
Immediately after being confirmed, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a slate of memos to Justice...
IHC Update: Protecting Your Company from the Inside – Analyzing New Administration Policies, Opposing State AG Policies, and Internal Pressures
Groff v. DeJoy: The Death of the “De Minimis” Test Breathes Life Back into Religious Accommodation
Sarah E. Lang
In a unanimous decision last June, the Supreme Court in Groff v. DeJoy heightened the...
Litigation Update: Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
Erin Wilcox
Fairfax County, Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology – commonly known as...
Litigation Update: Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
Erin Wilcox
Fairfax County, Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology – commonly known as...
Litigation Update: Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
TeleforumHarvard University School of Law Alumni Reception
Washington, DCCriminal Market Allocation or Pro-Competitive Agreement: The Debate over DOJ’s “No Poach” Prosecutions
R. Pepper Crutcher, Bernard A. Nigro, G. Zachary Terwilliger, Lindsey Vaala
No poaching allowed! No, you have not wandered into a Hunter’s Safety Forum, but rather...