At Stanford Law School, O’Connell teaches Administrative Law, Advanced Administrative Law, and Constitutional Law. The class of 2020 chose her to receive the Hurlbut Award, which is given to one professor “who strives to make teaching an art.” She co-chaired the steering committee for Stanford University’s Faculty Women’s Forum, which works to enable all women faculty to thrive, from August 2022 to January 2024 and jointly conducted two surveys on COVID’s impacts on faculty for FWF. Prior to joining Stanford University in 2018, O’Connell was the George Johnson Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. While there, she received the Distinguished Teaching Award (the campus’s most prestigious honor for teaching) in 2016 and Berkeley Law’s Rutter Award for Teaching Distinction in 2012. From April 2013 to July 2015, she served as associate dean for faculty development and research under three different deans. In 2013-2014, O’Connell was co-president of the Society for Empirical Legal Studies (co-organizing the 2014 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies).
Before joining the Berkeley Law faculty in 2004, O’Connell clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court during the October 2003 term. From 2001 to 2003, she was a trial attorney for the Federal Programs Branch of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Division, receiving commendations for her work. She clerked for Judge Stephen F. Williams of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 2000 to 2001. A Truman Scholar, O’Connell worked for a number of federal agencies in earlier years, including the Department of Defense (Offices of the General Counsel and Inspector General), Federal Trade Commission (Bureau of Competition), Department of Justice (Office of Legal Counsel), and U.S. Army (RDE). She is a member of the New York bar and served as a volunteer for the Biden-Harris Campaign’s policy team.
Agency Staff Regulatory Guidance
Paul S. Atkins, Barry P. Barbash, Andrew (Buddy) Donahue, Brian Rubin
Agency staff regulatory guidance, speeches, and settled enforcement actions can be helpful to the regulated...
Whistling in Chevronland: Why Department of Labor Interpretations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Provisions Do Not Deserve Judicial Deference
Donn C. Meindertsma
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Necessary & Proper Episode 46: Subdelegations of Rulemaking Power and the Appointments Clause
Kristin E. Hickman, Todd F. Gaziano, Anne Joseph O'Connell
The strictures of the Appointments Clause are receiving renewed attention in the courts, including the...
Topics
Deference and Independent Agencies
During the last week of its just-ended term, the Supreme Court handed down its much...
Topics
The Take Care Act
Yesterday, Senator Lee introduced a nine-page bill that would, following the next presidential election, eliminate...
Panel 4: Blockchain-Backed Cryptocurrencies: Order Without Law in the Digital Age
Mary Beth Buchanan, Jim Harper, Gary E. Marchant, John O. McGinnis, John B. Nalbandian
On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor...
Panel 4: Blockchain-Backed Cryptocurrencies: Order Without Law in the Digital Age
Mary Beth Buchanan, Jim Harper, Gary E. Marchant, John O. McGinnis, John B. Nalbandian
On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor...
From Orange Groves to Cryptocurrency: How Will the SEC Apply Longstanding Tests to New Technologies?
Troy Paredes, Scott Kimpel
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Topics
Argument Spotlight: Return Mail v. USPS
On February 20, 2019 the Supreme Court heard yet another case stemming from the...
Deep Dive Episode 38 – The Debate Over the SEC's Accredited Investor Standard
Urska Velikonja, J.W. Verret
This teleforum will consider the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s accredited investor standard. This standard...