Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Plenary Panel 3: Justice Alito’s Impact on Criminal Law & Procedure
Sarah Keeton Campbell, Benjamin J. Cassady, Andrew Oldham, Amul R. Thapar
Justice Alito has played a significant role in shaping contemporary criminal law and procedure, particularly...
Daniel Webster Debate Series: Should the Court Overturn Bostock?
Jon Greenbaum, Josh Hammer, Corey Maze
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter'sDaniel Webster Debate Series presents Daniel Webster Debate Series:Should the...
Do We Need Qualified Immunity?
Robert J. McNamara, Michael Perloff, Christopher J. Walker
Qualified immunity is perhaps the nation’s most controversial legal doctrine. Proponents say qualified immunity is necessary to give government officials—especially...
Panel 1: State Supreme Court Candidate Forum
Joseph T. Deters, Michael P. Donnelly, Lisa Forbes, Hon. Daniel R. Hawkins, Megan E. Shanahan, Melody Stewart, Christopher J. Walker
Featuring: Hon. Joseph Deters, Justice, Supreme Court of Ohio Hon. Michael Donnelly, Justice, Supreme Court of...
Challenges to Originalism VI: Originalism is Unjust
Lee J. Strang
The Federalist Society's Student Division & Georgetown Law Student Chapterpresent Challenges to Originalism VI:...
Challenges to Originalism V: Originalism is Not Up to the Task of Dealing with Modern Problems
The Federalist Society's Student Division & University of South Dakota School of Law Student...
Panel One: Judicial Independence and Trust: Has Article III Become Too Political?
Carlos T. Bea, Benjamin M. Flowers, Michael D. Ramsey, Eugene Volokh, Debra Wong Yang
All levels of the judiciary have faced increased attacks on their independence in recent years....
Showcase Panel IV: How Originalist is the Supreme Court?
J. Joel Alicea, Randy E. Barnett, Richard Fallon, Neomi Rao, Stephen E. Sachs
Featuring: Prof. J. Joel Alicea, Co-Director, Project on Constitutional Originalism and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition,...
Showcase Panel II: Whither Precedent?
Tara Leigh Grove, Randy J. Kozel, Gary Lawson, John O. McGinnis, William H. Pryor
No one maintains that the Court has always and forever been originalist in its orientation....
Litigation Update: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
Eli Nachmany, Ryan Patrick Mulvey
For the past thirty years, the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) has given the National Marine Fisheries...