President, Cass & Associates, PC
Ronald A. Cass is Dean Emeritus of Boston University School of Law (where he was Dean from 1990-2004), President of Cass & Associates, PC, former Vice-Chairman and Commissioner of the U.S. International Trade Commission, former faculty member at Boston University School of Law and the University of Virginia Law School, and Distinguished Senior Fellow at the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State. Dean Cass also sits as an arbitrator for commercial, international, and intellectual property rights disputes, and is a former United States member of the Panel of Conciliators of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. He is a member of the Council of the Administrative Conference of the United States and has received seven presidential appointments, spanning Presidents Ronald Reagan to Donald J. Trump.
As a law professor, lecturer, and scholar, Dean Cass has been teaching and writing about a wide array of legal issues on topics such as administrative law and regulation, antitrust, constitutional law, communications, intellectual property, international trade, separation of powers, and legal process. He has published more than 160 scholarly books, chapters, articles, and papers, including a leading casebook on administrative law. Dean Cass has taught judges as well as students in schools of law, economics, business, and public policy and has held academic appointments in the United States, Europe, and Latin America.
In addition to his academic work, Dean Cass has participated in numerous important legal cases as an amicus, consultant, or expert, and has advised businesses, law firms, investment funds, and government agencies on a range of trade, antitrust, intellectual property, and regulatory issues. He has a broad range of affiliations with professional groups, and has received numerous honors, fellowships and awards.
Dean Cass is a graduate of the University of Virginia and the University of Chicago Law School.
Topics
Textualism, the Clean Water Act, and San Francisco v. EPA
When a statute doesn’t give an administrative agency the power to do what the agency...
Topics
What to Do With Dewberry?: SCOTUS Decides Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers
This is a tale of two Dewberrys before the Supreme Court. Dewberry Engineers (“Engineers”), founded...
Topics
United States v. Skrmetti: Oral Arguments Indicate SCOTUS Justices Are Likely to Uphold Tennessee’s Ban on Gender Medicine for Minors
On Wednesday, December 3, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the...
Topics
Beals v. Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights: SCOTUS Sides With Virginia in Voter-Roll Clean-Up Dust-Up
Earlier this week, the state of Virginia found itself in the Supreme Court, requesting an...
Topics
Murthy Provides a Teachable Moment About the “Vast Power” of the Administrative State
Digital platforms, as private entities, enjoy First Amendment protection. Indeed, the Supreme Court said last...
Topics
Schadenfreude at the Supreme Court: San Francisco takes on the EPA
San Francisco is the Josef K. of the modern era of the administrative state. In...
The Curtain Falls on Chevron: Will the Chevron Two-Step Give Way to a Simpler Loper Bright-Line Rule?
Ronald A. Cass
Traditionally, administrative law cases don’t make news. Instead, they make snooze. They can be exciting...
Topics
“Tough Luck, Get a New Statute”
The Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy essentially means that administrative agencies cannot directly...
Topics
SCOTUS DIGs Idaho Abortion Cases
On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a one-sentence per curiam order in Moyle...
Topics
Garland v. Cargill: The Court’s Textualists Stick to Their Guns
Because it involves guns, Cargill v. Garland has been seen by supporters and opponents alike...