Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Panel III: Congress and the Administrative State: Prospects for Regulatory Reform
Nicholas Bagley, Emily Bremer, Jennifer Nou, Neomi Rao, Paul J. Ray
Featuring: Prof. Nicholas Bagley, Thomas G. Long Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School...
Panel: The Future of Administrative Statutes
Eric R. Bolinder, Tara Leigh Grove, Joshua Kleinfeld, Brian Gary Slocum, Ilan Wurman
This panel will explore the Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright as well as its...
Tech Roundup Episode 24 - DOGEing Barriers? Legal Challenges to AI in Government
Kevin Frazier, Dhruva Krishna, Megan Ma
Artificial Intelligence has been rapidly brought to the forefront of the public conversation in recent...
Daniel Webster Debate Series: Should the Court Restore Chevron?
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter'sDaniel Webster Debate Series presents Daniel Webster Debate Series:Should the...
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
John J. Vecchione
On January 17, 2024 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Loper Bright & Relentless
John J. Vecchione
In two cases this term (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. Department of...
Litigation Update: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
Eli Nachmany, Ryan Patrick Mulvey
For the past thirty years, the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) has given the National Marine Fisheries...
Litigation Update: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
Eli Nachmany, Ryan Patrick Mulvey
For the past thirty years, the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) has given the National Marine Fisheries...
Litigation Update: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
A Discussion on NMFS’s Regulatory Authority: Whales, Speed Limits, and Legal Questions
Braden H. Boucek, Jane Luxton
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), an arm of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration...