General Counsel, The Center for Individual Rights
Michael E. Rosman is CIR’s General Counsel. He graduated summa cum laude from the University of Rochester in 1981, majoring in economics and political science. He received his J.D. in 1984 from Yale Law School. Mr. Rosman worked as an associate at Rosenman & Colin in New York City from 1984-93.
Mr. Rosman joined CIR in March 1994. Mr. Rosman is the author of several articles, including: “Ambiguity and the First Amendment: Some Thoughts On All-White Advertising,” 61 Tenn. L. Rev. 289 (1993); and “Standing Alone: Standing Under The Fair Housing Act,” 60 Mo. L. Rev. 547 (1995), “Thoughts on Bakke and Its Effect on Race- Conscious Decision-Making,” 2002 U. Chi. Legal F. 45 Book Review of Kent Greenawalt’s Fighting Words, 13 Constitutional Commentary 317 (1996)
Mr. Rosman has litigated throughout the federal court system, and has argued many times in the federal courts of appeals. He also successfully argued on behalf of CIR client Tony Morrison in the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case of United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000).
Associate, Wiley Rein LLP
Joel S. Nolette is an associate at Wiley Rein LLP, where he advocates on behalf of corporate and individual clients in a broad spectrum of complex litigation matters. In 2017, Joel graduated cum laude from the Georgetown University Law Center, where he served as the Editor in Chief of Volume 15 of the Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. From 2019 to 2021, Joel clerked for the Honorable Raymond W. Gruender of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit; and from 2021 to 2022, he clerked for the Honorable Timothy J. Kelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Before attending law school, Joel graduated summa cum laude from Gordon College in Wenham, MA, with his Bachelor of Arts in Biblical Studies and worked as a letter carrier with the U.S. Postal Service.
Topics
Iowa Supreme Court Considers ABA Model Rule 8.4(g): Comment Deadline September 30, 2019
The Iowa Supreme Court is holding a public comment period until 4:30 on September 30,...
Topics
The Alaska Bar Association Considers ABA Model Rule 8.4(g): Comments Received Until August 15, 2019
The Alaska Bar Association recently announced that it is taking comments on Proposed Rule 8.4(f)...
Topics
Corporate Finance for Law—Essential and Ethical
Legal finance as it has evolved in the U.S. over the last decade reflects a...
Topics
South Dakota Lawyers To Vote Next Week on a Proposed Rule 8.4(g)
At the South Dakota Bar Annual Meeting on Friday, June 21, in Rapid City, South...
Is It Time to Revisit the Constitutionality of Unauthorized Practice of Law Rules?
Michael E. Rosman
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Topics
Why New Hampshire Should Not Adopt ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
The New Hampshire Supreme Court is holding a public comment period through April 11, 2019, on a...
Topics
Why D.C. Should Not Adopt ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
The D.C. Bar Rules of Professional Responsibility Review Committee is holding a public comment period...
Topics
Revisiting Agency Guidance
On Monday (January 28, 2019), immediately after the federal government shutdown ended, Deputy Associate Attorney...
Topics
Reconsidering the Legal Status of Agency Guidance
Late last year, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) took a quiet but significant step...
Lessons in Reading Law: Rimini Street v. Oracle’s Duel Over “Full Costs”
Joel S. Nolette
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...